LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PLASMACHEM-L Archives


PLASMACHEM-L Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Archives


December 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"...publish or perish..." (3 messages)
About manometers (2 messages)
About the origins of the infamous "black-box" (2 messages)
Academia - Can you set up a lab?: was Instrument malfunctions/Blackbox instruments (4 messages)
Academic job opportunity (1 message)
acid digestion safety (5 messages)
AgW (35/65) alloy (4 messages)
AW: acid digestion safety (1 message)
AW: AgW (35/65) alloy (1 message)
AW: Hg sorption in Teflon (1 message)
AW: Increased internal std (1 message)
AW: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES (2 messages)
Black boxes, instrument malfunctions and other weekend philosophy (2 messages)
boron (14 messages)
boron #2 (1 message)
boron (update) (3 messages)
Cairong Zhou 不在办公室。 (2 messages)
calcium pyrophosphate dissolution (1 message)
Career Opportunites at Dow Chemical (1 message)
Coal Plant Runoff (3 messages)
concentration of element in seawater (4 messages)
CONFIRM PLASMACHEM-L (1 message)
Constance on Palladium analysis (4 messages)
Diamond combustion (3 messages)
Dissolution of Zircons? (6 messages)
Hg sorption in Teflon (3 messages)
Hg with Cetac HGX-200 (2 messages)
Increased internal std (2 messages)
Instrument malfunctions - "to be" is an infinitive, not a question (2 messages)
Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the ques tion (3 messages)
Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question (30 messages)
interference equations (5 messages)
Iodine (2 messages)
New to Hf digestions (3 messages)
New version of GeoReM database (1 message)
once more .... problems with Hg ! (12 messages)
once more onto the breach dear friends .... problems with Hg ! (1 message)
organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement (23 messages)
Pennwood Chemicals? (4 messages)
PLASMACHEM-L Digest - 8 Dec 2006 to 9 Dec 2006 (#2006-76) (1 message)
Please remove me from the list (1 message)
PQ2 Torchbox and Gas Box (1 message)
problems with Hg, black box instruments, service reps and education (4 messages)
problems with, black box instruments, service reps and education (2 messages)
Recycling platinum metal ? (13 messages)
Ruthenium Oxide (3 messages)
Scientific Program - ISRANALYTICA 2007 (1 message)
Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES (5 messages)
Separating tissue from paraffin (3 messages)
Short Course at EGU on HR-ICP-MS (1 message)
trace S in biomass fractions (3 messages)
UC Davis Interdisciplinary Center for Plasma Mass Spectrometry (1 message)
Unbalanced RF power (4 messages)
What is the most suitable ICP-MS for laser ablation? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Home

PLASMACHEM-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"...publish or perish..."

Re: "...publish or perish..."

Tom Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:45:52 -0800

163 lines

Re: "...publish or perish..."

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 21:17:32 -0500

205 lines

Re: "...publish or perish..."

Tom Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:29:04 -0800

211 lines

New Thread

About manometers

About manometers

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:05:48 -0300

19 lines

Re: About manometers

Lazarski, Peter M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:22:36 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

About the origins of the infamous "black-box"

About the origins of the infamous "black-box"

Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2006 02:00:34 -0500

47 lines

Re: About the origins of the infamous "black-box"

Bob Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:48:23 -0600

58 lines

New Thread

Academia - Can you set up a lab?: was Instrument malfunctions/Blackbox instruments

Academia - Can you set up a lab?: was Instrument malfunctions/Blackbox instruments

Michael Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:01:51 -0500

184 lines

Re: Academia - Can you set up a lab?: was Instrument malfunctions/Blackbox instruments

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:40:33 -0600

48 lines

Re: Academia - Can you set up a lab?: was Instrument malfunctions/Blackbox instruments

Thomas J. Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:59:40 -0500

82 lines

Re: Academia - Can you set up a lab?: was Instrument malfunctions/Blackbox instruments

Timothy Mock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:22:45 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

Academic job opportunity

Academic job opportunity

Ray Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:17:04 -0000

55 lines

New Thread

acid digestion safety

acid digestion safety

HERMAN SINGH <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:23:26 +0200

31 lines

Re: acid digestion safety

Tina Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:13:13 +0000

85 lines

Re: acid digestion safety

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:30:20 -0000

64 lines

Re: acid digestion safety

Strixner-Harvey, Tania <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:43:23 +1000

124 lines

Re: acid digestion safety

Eileen Skelly Frame <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:19:00 EST

24 lines

New Thread

AgW (35/65) alloy

Re: AgW (35/65) alloy

Eileen Skelly Frame <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:31:51 EST

32 lines

Re: AgW (35/65) alloy

Eileen Skelly Frame <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:58:36 EST

16 lines

Re: AgW (35/65) alloy

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:39:38 -0500

43 lines

Re: AgW (35/65) alloy

Eileen Skelly Frame <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:19:28 EST

21 lines

New Thread

AW: acid digestion safety

AW: acid digestion safety

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:17:46 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

AW: AgW (35/65) alloy

AW: AgW (35/65) alloy

Stefan Juhl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:40:53 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

AW: Hg sorption in Teflon

AW: Hg sorption in Teflon

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:27:16 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

AW: Increased internal std

AW: Increased internal std

Joachim Nolte <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:55:01 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

AW: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

AW: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:09:11 +0100

139 lines

Re: AW: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Elena Dodova <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:17:28 -0500

174 lines

New Thread

Black boxes, instrument malfunctions and other weekend philosophy

Re: Black boxes, instrument malfunctions and other weekend philosophy

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:53:53 -0000

171 lines

Re: Black boxes, instrument malfunctions and other weekend philosophy

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:06:46 -0600

67 lines

New Thread

boron

boron

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:41:16 -0500

73 lines

Re: boron

Rick Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:54:38 -0500

115 lines

Re: boron

Thomas J Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:55:43 -0500

83 lines

Re: boron

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:13:55 +0200

73 lines

Re: boron

Billy Grimes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:18:29 -0700

98 lines

Re: boron

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:24:09 -0700

108 lines

Re: boron

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:30:13 -0500

160 lines

Re: boron

Jahl,Matthias J <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:35:11 -0500

89 lines

Re: boron

Jim Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:15:30 -0500

83 lines

Re: boron

Zdanowicz, Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:46:24 -0500

75 lines

Re: boron

Eileen Skelly Frame <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:10:37 EST

31 lines

Re: boron

AnalysisNow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:31:38 -0700

85 lines

Re: boron

Warren Boothman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:15:53 -0500

66 lines

Re: boron

Huber, Daniel (IPG Corvallis) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:06:27 -0600

111 lines

New Thread

boron #2

Re: boron #2

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:34:42 -0500

101 lines

New Thread

boron (update)

Re: boron (update)

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:49:32 -0500

191 lines

Re: boron (update)

Rick Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:34:05 -0500

226 lines

Re: boron (update)

Billy Grimes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:53:21 -0700

207 lines

New Thread

Cairong Zhou 不在办公室。

Cairong Zhou 不在办公室。

Carl Zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:00:44 +0800

25 lines

Re: Cairong Zhou 不在办公室。

Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:41:50 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

calcium pyrophosphate dissolution

calcium pyrophosphate dissolution

DRA. ZULLY BENZO <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:10:48 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Career Opportunites at Dow Chemical

Career Opportunites at Dow Chemical

Lora Brehm <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:31:24 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Coal Plant Runoff

Coal Plant Runoff

Hyland, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:19:32 -0600

20 lines

Re: Coal Plant Runoff

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:50:47 -0700

56 lines

Re: Coal Plant Runoff

Ian Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:28:37 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

concentration of element in seawater

concentration of element in seawater

william wong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:05:43 -0800

29 lines

Re: concentration of element in seawater

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:13:28 -0500

59 lines

Re: concentration of element in seawater

Paul Field <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:06:01 -0500

48 lines

Re: concentration of element in seawater

william wong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:11:48 -0800

78 lines

New Thread

CONFIRM PLASMACHEM-L

CONFIRM PLASMACHEM-L

Marcos J. L. Lemes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:10:40 -0600

13 lines

New Thread

Constance on Palladium analysis

Constance on Palladium analysis

Guy-Michel Bonneau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:33:28 -0500

56 lines

Re: Constance on Palladium analysis

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:55:53 +0200

76 lines

Re: Constance on Palladium analysis

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:35:07 -0500

76 lines

Re: Constance on Palladium analysis

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:15:33 +1000

113 lines

New Thread

Diamond combustion

Diamond combustion

Thomas J. Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:20:44 -0500

33 lines

Re: Diamond combustion

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:32:41 +1100

61 lines

Re: Diamond combustion

Thomas J Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:45 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

Dissolution of Zircons?

Dissolution of Zircons?

Wharton, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:53:09 -0000

47 lines

Re: Dissolution of Zircons?

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:37:27 -0000

89 lines

Re: Dissolution of Zircons?

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:41:40 +0200

68 lines

Re: Dissolution of Zircons?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:18:31 +1100

62 lines

Re: Dissolution of Zircons?

Jean-Philippe Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:02:42 -0500

87 lines

Re: Dissolution of Zircons?

Juan Pablo Bernal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:56:57 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

Hg sorption in Teflon

Hg sorption in Teflon

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:00:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: Hg sorption in Teflon

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:10:21 -0700

81 lines

Re: Hg sorption in Teflon

Billy Grimes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:05:07 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Hg with Cetac HGX-200

Hg with Cetac HGX-200

Jan Wiederhold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:01:36 -0500

16 lines

Re: Hg with Cetac HGX-200

Tom Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:34:42 -0800

73 lines

New Thread

Increased internal std

Increased internal std

David Denhaan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:21:24 -0600

27 lines

Re: Increased internal std

Joe Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:12:34 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

Instrument malfunctions - "to be" is an infinitive, not a question

Re: Instrument malfunctions - "to be" is an infinitive, not a question

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:58:06 -0500

52 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - "to be" is an infinitive, not a question

Joe Cruse <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:28:14 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the ques tion

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the ques tion

Chace, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:20:57 -0500

100 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the ques tion

Tina Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:34:31 +0000

144 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the ques tion

Pier de Groot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:59:00 +0100

143 lines

New Thread

Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:54:23 +0200

68 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:07:00 +1000

128 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:45:23 +1100

102 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:51:45 +1000

154 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:11:30 -0000

224 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Timothy Mock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:39:40 -0500

112 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Dave Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:03:33 -0700

45 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Tina Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:13:28 +0000

41 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Michael Größl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:24:02 +0100

67 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:31:42 -0500

51 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Michael Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:52:23 -0500

102 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Gary Hieftje <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:04:39 -0500

133 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:16:45 -0600

39 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Pier de Groot <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2006 00:18:05 +0100

201 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Michael Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 18:54:27 -0500

239 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:20:16 -0600

55 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Dec 2006 08:32:34 +0200

32 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:43:22 +1000

66 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:04:55 +1100

110 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:42:11 -0600

40 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Gary Hieftje <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:49:26 -0500

67 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:02:45 +0200

83 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:07:58 -0600

43 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Joe Cruse <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:17:25 -0600

58 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Jim Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:24:41 -0500

73 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Bob Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:28:47 -0600

65 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Jahl,Matthias J <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:44:02 -0500

47 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:01:13 +0200

60 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:01:38 -0000

73 lines

Re: Instrument malfunctions - to be or not to be that is the question

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:03:40 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

interference equations

interference equations

Ales Judez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:46:03 -0500

16 lines

Re: interference equations

chris ottley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:57:34 +0000

71 lines

Re: interference equations

Debbie Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:31:44 -0600

32 lines

Re: interference equations

Loughran, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:12:55 -0000

58 lines

Re: interference equations

Debbie Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:55:59 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Iodine

Iodine

Gareth Newman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:56:00 +0000

31 lines

Re: Iodine

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:36:08 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

New to Hf digestions

New to Hf digestions

Erich Jacobsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:16:54 -0500

25 lines

Re: New to Hf digestions

Diego Zurbriggen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:57:05 -0500

97 lines

Re: New to Hf digestions

Devos, Wim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:15:24 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

New version of GeoReM database

New version of GeoReM database

Klaus Peter Jochum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:46:29 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

once more .... problems with Hg !

once more .... problems with Hg !

Mike g <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:43:28 -0500

34 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Chace, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:49:28 -0500

51 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Mike g <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:53:22 -0500

11 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Peter Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:56:07 -0800

83 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Moriamo Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:00:24 -0600

92 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

William G Brumbaugh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:04:53 -0600

53 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Mike g <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:08:11 -0500

11 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Mike g <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:08:11 -0500

11 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:10:38 -0500

98 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:20:56 -0000

122 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Mike g <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:49:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: once more .... problems with Hg !

Michael Guggemos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:51:47 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

once more onto the breach dear friends .... problems with Hg !

Re: once more onto the breach dear friends .... problems with Hg !

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:11:58 +0200

94 lines

New Thread

organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

vestel shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:14:46 -0500

29 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:52:41 +0200

37 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

vestel shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:00:17 -0500

60 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Paul Field <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:03:01 -0500

50 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Jim Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:07:09 -0500

58 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Thomas J. Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:11:38 -0500

59 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:11:44 -0500

38 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Thorsten Hoß <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:25:16 +0100

62 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Robin Rattray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:34:46 -0500

71 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:36:27 -0500

54 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Lambert,Tim [Edm] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:38:05 -0700

85 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:50:58 +0200

65 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Huo, Dengwei (GNF) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:53:50 -0500

91 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:11:18 -0500

107 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

vestel shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:24:49 -0500

150 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Parsons, Jason G <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:47:52 -0700

209 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Strixner-Harvey, Tania <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:16:08 +1000

88 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

vestel shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:28:22 -0500

106 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:51:25 -0500

116 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Strixner-Harvey, Tania <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:21:49 +1000

135 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:26:13 -0000

168 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

Matt Kitching <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:38:46 +1000

17 lines

Re: organic versus inorganic phosphate measurement

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:10:37 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Pennwood Chemicals?

Pennwood Chemicals?

Jeremy Inglis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:25:26 -0500

28 lines

Re: Pennwood Chemicals?

Lazarski, Peter M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:31:13 -0500

39 lines

Re: Pennwood Chemicals?

Jeremy Inglis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:39:17 -0500

79 lines

Re: Pennwood Chemicals?

Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:54:03 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

PLASMACHEM-L Digest - 8 Dec 2006 to 9 Dec 2006 (#2006-76)

Re: PLASMACHEM-L Digest - 8 Dec 2006 to 9 Dec 2006 (#2006-76)

Ariel Anbar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:05:34 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

Please remove me from the list

Please remove me from the list

Joe Pescatore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:40:05 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

PQ2 Torchbox and Gas Box

PQ2 Torchbox and Gas Box

Jahl,Matthias J <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:34:37 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

problems with Hg, black box instruments, service reps and education

problems with Hg, black box instruments, service reps and education

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:47:26 -0500

65 lines

Re: problems with Hg, black box instruments, service reps and education

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:55 +1000

123 lines

Re: problems with Hg, black box instruments, service reps and education

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:43:50 -0500

150 lines

Re: problems with Hg, black box instruments, service reps and education

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:42:27 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

problems with, black box instruments, service reps and education

Re: problems with, black box instruments, service reps and education

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:58:49 -0500

46 lines

Re: problems with, black box instruments, service reps and education

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:48:50 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

Recycling platinum metal ?

Recycling platinum metal ?

Claude Dalpe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:09:42 -0500

21 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Higgins, Barry J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:22:22 -0600

30 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Pam Halpin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:28:05 -0500

32 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Diego Zurbriggen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:41:56 -0500

79 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:36:16 -0700

61 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Upchurch, Larry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:01:41 -0600

48 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Mahabub Rahman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:23:42 -0800

47 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Lawrence Neufeld <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:46:12 -0800

53 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Krushevska, Antoaneta P (GE, Research) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:54:48 -0500

60 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Jean-Philippe Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:10:53 -0500

43 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Claude Dalpe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:33:01 -0500

46 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Andrew Toms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:44:36 -0500

40 lines

Re: Recycling platinum metal ?

Laurie Ottmar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:20:33 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

Ruthenium Oxide

Ruthenium Oxide

Amir Liba <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:17:51 -0800

36 lines

Re: Ruthenium Oxide

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:50:31 -0500

49 lines

Re: Ruthenium Oxide

Ian Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Dec 2006 07:53:55 -0800

55 lines

New Thread

Scientific Program - ISRANALYTICA 2007

Scientific Program - ISRANALYTICA 2007

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:57:44 +0200

207 lines

New Thread

Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Elena Dodova <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:56:45 -0500

34 lines

Re: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Jim Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:03:26 -0500

53 lines

Re: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Elena Dodova <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:03:29 -0500

78 lines

Re: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Shi, Youqing <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:23:01 -0500

74 lines

Re: Se and S signals in ICP-MS/ICP-OES

Jim Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:46:07 -0500

118 lines

New Thread

Separating tissue from paraffin

Separating tissue from paraffin

brian wels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:04:36 -0600

27 lines

Re: Separating tissue from paraffin

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:26:59 -0500

46 lines

Re: Separating tissue from paraffin

Tom Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:39:45 -0800

76 lines

New Thread

Short Course at EGU on HR-ICP-MS

Short Course at EGU on HR-ICP-MS

Pier de Groot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:13:22 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

trace S in biomass fractions

trace S in biomass fractions

J. Michael Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:29:04 -0600

59 lines

Re: trace S in biomass fractions

Diego Zurbriggen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:47:41 -0500

123 lines

Re: trace S in biomass fractions

J. Michael Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:03:39 -0600

137 lines

New Thread

UC Davis Interdisciplinary Center for Plasma Mass Spectrometry

UC Davis Interdisciplinary Center for Plasma Mass Spectrometry

Robert Rucker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:31:02 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

Unbalanced RF power

Unbalanced RF power

Michael Groessl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:11:37 -0500

19 lines

Re: Unbalanced RF power

Kent Dyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:02:03 -0500

43 lines

Re: Unbalanced RF power

Shawn Conver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:13:24 -0500

38 lines

Re: Unbalanced RF power

Nathan F. Dalleska <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:01:42 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

What is the most suitable ICP-MS for laser ablation?

What is the most suitable ICP-MS for laser ablation?

Honglin Yuan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:50:54 +0800

27 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager