LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PLASMACHEM-L Archives


PLASMACHEM-L Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Archives


September 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"interference analysis in any matrix" (1 message)
A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help. (5 messages)
Admin: Blatant advertising: was -...ContrAA 700 (3 messages)
Administrative: remember to use a signature block - PLEASE! (1 message)
Al suppression on ICP-AES (6 messages)
Answers shared on grinding solid samples... (7 messages)
Answers shared: Agilent 7500 ICPMS communication problem (1 message)
Anymatrix revolutions (1 message)
Argon question (6 messages)
AW: Answers shared on grinding solid samples... (1 message)
AW: Fume Hood Selection (4 messages)
AW: Speciation training (1 message)
Bottle In quagmiry (1 message)
Bottle Inquiry (7 messages)
Bottle Inquiry -light (1 message)
CCT gas for sulfur analysis (3 messages)
CCT,CRI, DRC - SOPs (2 messages)
Cesium. ICP or AAS? (1 message)
CETAC ASX-100 and Thermo XSeries2 (3 messages)
Client requests (16 messages)
correct myself in APDC concentration (1 message)
detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else? (5 messages)
Determination of Al, Li, Ba and Ti in seawater (2 messages)
Doubly charge (12 messages)
Element Software Course (2 messages)
Fe ppt (2 messages)
filtering cloudy samples (5 messages)
Fume Hood Selection (2 messages)
FW: Method 200.8 + drinking water (2 messages)
Fwd: Vials for the Agilent I-AS (1 message)
Have your own session at the EGU 2009 (1 message)
Heavy metals (5 messages)
HEPA/ULPA vacuum without glass filters (3 messages)
HF sample matirx (2 messages)
hoods (1 message)
ICP question (9 messages)
ICP-MS Software Product Manager Vacancy - Agilent (1 message)
Intergrating a Optima 5300DV ICP-OES with a Sample Master LIMS from Accelerated Technology Laboratories (1 message)
Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth? (18 messages)
Kudzu! (9 messages)
Kudzu! Thanks, but really meant Kudzu (2 messages)
Large Hadron Rap (2 messages)
Manual for a Spectromass 2000!! (1 message)
Many problems (5 messages)
MASS FLOW CONTROLLER INSTALLATION (2 messages)
matrix spike/MSD (4 messages)
Metal analysis in TCE (4 messages)
Method 200.8 + drinking water (57 messages)
Mn problem (5 messages)
more accurate sulphite method (1 message)
Need analysis of Pt at ppt levels (2 messages)
NH3 Cell gas and Ru102 Problem (2 messages)
NOMAIL (1 message)
OES analysis of seawater (4 messages)
Pb,Tl and Ba (11 messages)
PE DRCe (7 messages)
PE DRCe for waste waters (1 message)
PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3 (5 messages)
PE WinLab32 OES and Vista (2 messages)
Perkin Elmer Optima 5300 DV Users (1 message)
Post-doctoral fellowship (1 message)
Postdoc opening (1 message)
Samrec Code (2 messages)
Selfrag as an alternative: Answers shared on grinding solid samples... (2 messages)
Shoot out at OK coral - reaction vs collision - quo vadis (2 messages)
Speciation training (1 message)
Thallium carry out/wash over: Hg, Tl at the same time: "Basic" chemistry (2 messages)
Thallium carry over/wash out (13 messages)
unsubscribe [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (1 message)
Vials for the Agilent I-AS (5 messages)
Wake up, the matrix has you. Follow the white rabbit. Knock knock... (1 message)
Where do you find meaning in your work? (1 message)
Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700 (8 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Home

PLASMACHEM-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"interference analysis in any matrix"

Re: "interference analysis in any matrix"

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:37:26 -0400

133 lines

New Thread

A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help.

A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help.

David Ruddell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:32:42 -0400

52 lines

Re: A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help.

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:44:31 -0400

87 lines

Re: A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help.

David Ruddell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:13:58 -0400

23 lines

Re: A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help.

Lyndon Palmer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:24:08 +0930

89 lines

Re: A (somewhat embarrassing) request for help.

ZDANOWICZ, VINCENT <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:58:38 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Admin: Blatant advertising: was -...ContrAA 700

Admin: Blatant advertising: was -...ContrAA 700

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:26:58 -0400

112 lines

Re: Admin: Blatant advertising: was -...ContrAA 700

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:17:41 +1000

146 lines

Re: Admin: Blatant advertising: was -...ContrAA 700

Jörg Hansmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:16:38 +0200

140 lines

New Thread

Administrative: remember to use a signature block - PLEASE!

Administrative: remember to use a signature block - PLEASE!

Michael Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:53:26 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Al suppression on ICP-AES

Al suppression on ICP-AES

Bronwyn Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:26:20 -0400

32 lines

Re: Al suppression on ICP-AES

Huo, Dengwei (GNF) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:38:54 -0400

74 lines

Re: Al suppression on ICP-AES

Litchert, Douglas L. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:11:12 -0400

89 lines

Re: Al suppression on ICP-AES

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:57:21 -0500

65 lines

Re: Al suppression on ICP-AES

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:54:59 -0400

153 lines

Re: Al suppression on ICP-AES

Kelly, Bronwyn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:28:50 -0400

108 lines

New Thread

Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:05:33 +1200

84 lines

Re: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Huo, Dengwei (GNF) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:04:53 -0400

110 lines

Re: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 22:37:01 +1000

105 lines

Re: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

John A. Anzelmo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:13:42 -0400

87 lines

Re: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:22:43 +1200

172 lines

Re: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 02:06:03 +0300

98 lines

Re: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

John A. Anzelmo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:12:20 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

Answers shared: Agilent 7500 ICPMS communication problem

Answers shared: Agilent 7500 ICPMS communication problem

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:08:51 +1200

55 lines

New Thread

Anymatrix revolutions

Re: Anymatrix revolutions

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:33:44 -0400

139 lines

New Thread

Argon question

Argon question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:56:50 -0500

44 lines

Re: Argon question

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:12:11 -0500

44 lines

Re: Argon question

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:14:36 -0400

89 lines

Re: Argon question

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:21:30 -0700

99 lines

Re: Argon question

Rennie, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:54:15 +1000

130 lines

Re: Argon question

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:22:42 +1000

73 lines

New Thread

AW: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

AW: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:46:40 +0200

222 lines

New Thread

AW: Fume Hood Selection

AW: Fume Hood Selection

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 23:16:03 +0200

101 lines

Re: AW: Fume Hood Selection

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:11:15 -0400

135 lines

Re: AW: Fume Hood Selection

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:34:16 -0400

180 lines

Re: AW: Fume Hood Selection

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:53:56 -0400

236 lines

New Thread

AW: Speciation training

AW: Speciation training

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:41:13 +0200

87 lines

New Thread

Bottle In quagmiry

Re: Bottle In quagmiry

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:46:02 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

Bottle Inquiry

Bottle Inquiry

Kate McPeek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:48:05 -0700

37 lines

Re: Bottle Inquiry

Vaive, Judy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:54:04 -0400

69 lines

Re: Bottle Inquiry

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:57:37 -0400

82 lines

Re: Bottle Inquiry

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:48:31 -0400

80 lines

Re: Bottle Inquiry

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:06:56 -0600

127 lines

Re: Bottle Inquiry

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:16:40 -0500

151 lines

Re: Bottle Inquiry

Kate McPeek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:05:29 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

Bottle Inquiry -light

Re: Bottle Inquiry -light

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:28:56 -0400

184 lines

New Thread

CCT gas for sulfur analysis

CCT gas for sulfur analysis

Gwyneth Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:28:00 -0700

35 lines

Re: CCT gas for sulfur analysis

isaac brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:10:18 +0000

25 lines

Re: CCT gas for sulfur analysis

Keenan, Fergus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:05:21 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

CCT,CRI, DRC - SOPs

Re: CCT,CRI, DRC - SOPs

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:04:50 +0300

170 lines

Re: CCT,CRI, DRC - SOPs

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:56:01 -0400

104 lines

New Thread

Cesium. ICP or AAS?

Cesium. ICP or AAS?

E Marcano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:49:42 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

CETAC ASX-100 and Thermo XSeries2

CETAC ASX-100 and Thermo XSeries2

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:43:57 -0700

25 lines

Re: CETAC ASX-100 and Thermo XSeries2

Paul Field <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:01:32 -0400

35 lines

Re: CETAC ASX-100 and Thermo XSeries2

Wills, Julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:26:14 +0200

64 lines

New Thread

Client requests

Client requests

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:29:11 +1200

208 lines

Re: Client requests

Steve Pulford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:33:47 -0600

225 lines

Re: Client requests

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:55:47 -0400

58 lines

Re: Client requests

Qingzhu Yin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:01:36 -0700

71 lines

Re: Client requests

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:42:14 -0400

46 lines

Re: Client requests

Martin Lindsay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:04:54 +0800

41 lines

Re: Client requests

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:12:03 -0400

87 lines

Re: Client requests

HERZIG, REED [AG/1000] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:39:08 -0500

72 lines

Re: Client requests

Laurie Ottmar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:27:20 -0400

163 lines

Re: Client requests

James Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:47:47 -0400

62 lines

Re: Client requests

Michael Kroc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:50:14 -0400

32 lines

Re: Client requests

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:58:16 -0400

49 lines

Re: Client requests

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:13:52 -0400

113 lines

Re: Client requests

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:25:53 -0400

133 lines

Re: Client requests

McClelland, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:29:43 -0700

28 lines

Re: Client requests

WRAY DAVID S <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:57:35 GMT

159 lines

New Thread

correct myself in APDC concentration

Re: correct myself in APDC concentration

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:53:46 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else?

detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:36:12 -0400

87 lines

Re: detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:45:40 -0400

129 lines

Re: detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else?

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:41:18 -0700

81 lines

Re: detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:14:15 -0400

168 lines

Re: detectable Cu interference with collision cell? or something else?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:48:41 +1000

211 lines

New Thread

Determination of Al, Li, Ba and Ti in seawater

Determination of Al, Li, Ba and Ti in seawater

Tahir Zaidi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:07:40 +0300

32 lines

Re: Determination of Al, Li, Ba and Ti in seawater

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:28:02 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

Doubly charge

Doubly charge

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:58:55 -0500

27 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Huo, Dengwei (GNF) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:09:38 -0400

61 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:28:02 -0400

67 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Michael Grinshtein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:42:26 -0700

60 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:22:11 -0500

87 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:34:34 -0400

103 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:27:09 -0500

123 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:43:03 -0700

167 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:16:34 -0500

177 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:26:44 +1000

193 lines

Re: Doubly charge

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:42:08 -0400

222 lines

Re: Doubly charge

yingtao chai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:47:10 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Element Software Course

Re: Element Software Course

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:53:36 -0400

39 lines

Re: Element Software Course

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:58:32 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

Fe ppt

Fe ppt

Tom Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:39:02 -0400

14 lines

Re: Fe ppt

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:00:38 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

filtering cloudy samples

filtering cloudy samples

M J Loughran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:55:16 -0400

39 lines

Re: filtering cloudy samples

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:11:43 -0400

73 lines

Re: filtering cloudy samples

Diego Zurbriggen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:25:24 -0400

120 lines

Re: filtering cloudy samples

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:31:07 -0400

113 lines

Re: filtering cloudy samples

William G Brumbaugh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:40:26 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

Fume Hood Selection

Fume Hood Selection

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:35:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: Fume Hood Selection

Bryan L. Brattin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:37:17 -0400

220 lines

New Thread

FW: Method 200.8 + drinking water

FW: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Keenan, Fergus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:38:00 -0400

134 lines

Re: FW: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Robert Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:38:31 -0400

170 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Fwd: Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Craig Westphal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:58:24 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

Have your own session at the EGU 2009

Have your own session at the EGU 2009

Pier de Groot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:46:51 +0200

83 lines

New Thread

Heavy metals

Heavy metals

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:03:02 +1200

93 lines

Re: Heavy metals

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:09:14 -0400

118 lines

Re: Heavy metals

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:34:37 +1200

150 lines

Re: Heavy metals

AnalysisNow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:02:25 -0700

138 lines

Re: Heavy metals

Parsons, Jason G <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:46:17 -0600

115 lines

New Thread

HEPA/ULPA vacuum without glass filters

HEPA/ULPA vacuum without glass filters

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:49:04 -0400

44 lines

Re: HEPA/ULPA vacuum without glass filters

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:37:28 -0400

86 lines

Re: HEPA/ULPA vacuum without glass filters

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:02:16 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

HF sample matirx

Re: HF sample matirx

Schurter, Lynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:14:46 -0400

61 lines

Re: HF sample matirx

John Northrop <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:06:09 -0400

111 lines

New Thread

hoods

hoods

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:03:43 -0400

114 lines

New Thread

ICP question

ICP question

Matt Riezen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:40:14 -0500

19 lines

Re: ICP question

vestel shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:54:08 -0400

40 lines

Re: ICP question

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:03:18 -0500

41 lines

ICP question

Robert G. Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:08:49 -0400

44 lines

Re: ICP question

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:19:48 -0400

27 lines

Re: ICP question

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:24:52 -0400

39 lines

Re: ICP question

H Muhanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:12:32 +0300

28 lines

Re: ICP question

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:25:43 +0300

78 lines

Re: ICP question

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:04:33 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

ICP-MS Software Product Manager Vacancy - Agilent

ICP-MS Software Product Manager Vacancy - Agilent

Don Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2008 10:32:14 -0400

84 lines

New Thread

Intergrating a Optima 5300DV ICP-OES with a Sample Master LIMS from Accelerated Technology Laboratories

Intergrating a Optima 5300DV ICP-OES with a Sample Master LIMS from Accelerated Technology Laboratories

Denhaan, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:54:19 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:39:36 -0400

220 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:28:36 +1000

227 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:09:36 -0400

224 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:00:28 +1000

226 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:49:36 +1000

211 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:49:12 -0600

155 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:01:28 +1000

176 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

Don Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:53:52 -0400

240 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:01:10 +1000

178 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:25:08 +1300

209 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:39:12 +1000

68 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:56:45 -0400

197 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:37:08 +1000

71 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:36:27 -0400

137 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

Don Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:37:34 -0400

57 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

Don Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:13:02 -0400

43 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:42:55 +1000

168 lines

Re: Is "interference analysis in any matrix" a fair claim or stretching the truth?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:55:35 +1000

93 lines

New Thread

Kudzu!

Re: Kudzu!

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:37:32 -0400

78 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Henry G Tomasiewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:06:38 -0500

96 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Henry G Tomasiewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:08:58 -0500

93 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:31:39 -0700

110 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:33:12 -0400

118 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:46:14 +0100

131 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Robert Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:23:25 -0400

122 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:47:50 +1000

135 lines

Re: Kudzu!

Robert Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:53:04 -0400

157 lines

New Thread

Kudzu! Thanks, but really meant Kudzu

Re: Kudzu! Thanks, but really meant Kudzu

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:20:07 -0400

54 lines

Re: Kudzu! Thanks, but really meant Kudzu

Henry G Tomasiewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:28:26 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Large Hadron Rap

Large Hadron Rap

Thomas J Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:57:11 -0400

25 lines

Re: Large Hadron Rap

Joe Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:02:33 +0300

43 lines

New Thread

Manual for a Spectromass 2000!!

Manual for a Spectromass 2000!!

ugez323 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:07:33 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Many problems

Re: Many problems

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:15:58 -0400

108 lines

Re: Many problems

Jones, Deanna M. (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) (CTR) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:07:20 -0400

142 lines

Re: Many problems

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:01:27 -0400

52 lines

Re: Many problems

Sampson, Barry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:17:05 +0100

86 lines

Re: Many problems

Dean Bass, PhD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:18:22 -0500

177 lines

New Thread

MASS FLOW CONTROLLER INSTALLATION

MASS FLOW CONTROLLER INSTALLATION

Kevin Grooms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:41:42 -0500

42 lines

Re: MASS FLOW CONTROLLER INSTALLATION

Kevin Grooms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:40:41 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

matrix spike/MSD

Re: matrix spike/MSD

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:43:36 +1200

216 lines

Re: matrix spike/MSD

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:15:47 -0400

101 lines

Re: matrix spike/MSD

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:18:28 +1200

169 lines

Re: matrix spike/MSD

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:26:09 -0400

206 lines

New Thread

Metal analysis in TCE

Metal analysis in TCE

Yixiang Duan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:59:44 -0600

55 lines

Re: Metal analysis in TCE

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:12:40 -0400

103 lines

Re: Metal analysis in TCE

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:55:42 -0400

91 lines

Re: Metal analysis in TCE

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:19:11 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Method 200.8 + drinking water

Method 200.8 + drinking water

Keenan, Fergus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:18:51 -0400

201 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:59:41 +0300

213 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:54:39 +1000

155 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:05:19 +1000

140 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:27:32 +0300

147 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:13:58 -0400

163 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Jon Talbott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:15:49 -0500

169 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:05:16 +1000

227 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:50:52 -0400

127 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:32:05 +0300

139 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:01:55 -0400

206 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:07:05 +1000

121 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Keenan, Fergus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:34:27 -0400

117 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Jon Talbott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:34:59 -0500

147 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:35:16 +1000

156 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:51:19 -0400

152 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:59:13 +1000

196 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:34:33 -0600

147 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:58:28 -0400

123 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:53:16 -0700

55 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:16:28 +0300

159 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:33:39 -0400

210 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:51:23 -0400

230 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:00:19 +0100

221 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:32:14 +1000

98 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:38:29 +1000

166 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:14:26 +1000

199 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:44:10 -0600

164 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:46:27 +1000

209 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Lars Frøsig Østergaard (pd) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:06:08 +0200

132 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:47:42 +1000

93 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Lars Frøsig Østergaard (pd) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:27:47 +0200

110 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:18:29 +0930

167 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:00:42 -0400

215 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:11:15 +1000

156 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:21:01 +1000

198 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:25:22 +1000

230 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Kent Dyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:18:26 -0400

187 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Steve Pulford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:48:42 -0600

108 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:21:21 +1000

139 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:24:11 -0400

18 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:08:25 +0930

66 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:18:04 -0400

85 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Keenan, Fergus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:19:24 -0400

147 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:55:45 -0400

75 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:16:54 -0400

37 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:19:23 +0930

83 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:03:55 +1000

120 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:51:54 +0930

166 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:23:48 +1000

124 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:56:39 +0930

149 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Robert Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:42:19 -0400

175 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Don Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:38:32 -0400

25 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Keenan, Fergus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:27:27 +0100

158 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Don Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:26:02 -0400

203 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Robert Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:37:09 -0400

228 lines

Re: Method 200.8 + drinking water

Robert Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:55:51 -0400

232 lines

New Thread

Mn problem

Re: Mn problem

Deanna Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:22:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: Mn problem

Sampson, Barry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:32:16 +0100

61 lines

Re: Mn problem

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:40:20 -0400

46 lines

Re: Mn problem

Deanna Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:21:54 -0400

60 lines

Re: Mn problem

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:17:45 +1200

98 lines

New Thread

more accurate sulphite method

more accurate sulphite method

Ebrahim Seedat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:08:24 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

Need analysis of Pt at ppt levels

Need analysis of Pt at ppt levels

Carol Stork <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:06:24 -0400

14 lines

Re: Need analysis of Pt at ppt levels

Parsons, Jason G <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:14:52 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

NH3 Cell gas and Ru102 Problem

Re: NH3 Cell gas and Ru102 Problem

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:54:23 -0700

27 lines

Re: NH3 Cell gas and Ru102 Problem

Parsons, Jason G <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:13:22 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

NOMAIL

NOMAIL

Dr. Harald Berger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:51:17 +0200

14 lines

New Thread

OES analysis of seawater

OES analysis of seawater

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:10:23 -0700

38 lines

Re: OES analysis of seawater

Bryan L. Brattin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:27:46 -0400

87 lines

Re: OES analysis of seawater

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:10:53 -0500

120 lines

Re: OES analysis of seawater

Bryan L. Brattin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:20:15 -0400

160 lines

New Thread

Pb,Tl and Ba

Pb,Tl and Ba

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:00:27 -0500

26 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:29:04 +0300

41 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:19:24 -0400

52 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

mfort <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:25:34 -0400

74 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:04:35 -0500

65 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:12:57 -0500

90 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Robert Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:38:40 -0500

119 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:55:58 -0400

85 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Dobney Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:03:30 +0200

118 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:32:49 -0500

98 lines

Re: Pb,Tl and Ba

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:39:04 -0500

149 lines

New Thread

PE DRCe

PE DRCe

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:18:29 -0500

17 lines

Re: PE DRCe

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:36:13 +0300

31 lines

Re: PE DRCe

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:26:34 -0400

116 lines

Re: PE DRCe

Galvin-Karr, Marge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:05:57 -0400

143 lines

Re: PE DRCe

Boyles, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:51:23 -0700

56 lines

PE DRCe

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:16:49 -0500

40 lines

Re: PE DRCe

Matthew Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:10:13 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

PE DRCe for waste waters

Re: PE DRCe for waste waters

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:13:29 +0300

154 lines

New Thread

PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3

PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:48:42 -0700

26 lines

Re: PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:27:28 -0500

42 lines

Re: PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3

mickael murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:21:40 -0700

55 lines

Re: PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:43:00 -0700

66 lines

Re: PE OES WinLab32 and XP SP3

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:37:08 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

PE WinLab32 OES and Vista

PE WinLab32 OES and Vista

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:20:06 -0700

28 lines

Re: PE WinLab32 OES and Vista

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:58:52 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Perkin Elmer Optima 5300 DV Users

Re: Perkin Elmer Optima 5300 DV Users

Ronald Goehner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:24:19 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Post-doctoral fellowship

Post-doctoral fellowship

Todd Housh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:24:42 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Postdoc opening

Postdoc opening

Gary Hieftje <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:04:36 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Samrec Code

Samrec Code

John Zvimba <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:46:21 +0200

51 lines

Re: Samrec Code

Sven Fjastad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:00:12 +0800

80 lines

New Thread

Selfrag as an alternative: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Re: Selfrag as an alternative: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Michael Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:04:13 -0400

87 lines

Re: Selfrag as an alternative: Answers shared on grinding solid samples...

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:57:52 +1000

92 lines

New Thread

Shoot out at OK coral - reaction vs collision - quo vadis

Re: Shoot out at OK coral - reaction vs collision - quo vadis

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:22:18 +0300

43 lines

Re: Shoot out at OK coral - reaction vs collision - quo vadis

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:01:18 +1000

91 lines

New Thread

Speciation training

Speciation training

ridzuan said <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:10:36 +0800

52 lines

New Thread

Thallium carry out/wash over: Hg, Tl at the same time: "Basic" chemistry

Re: Thallium carry out/wash over: Hg, Tl at the same time: "Basic" chemistry

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:00:41 -0400

81 lines

Re: Thallium carry out/wash over: Hg, Tl at the same time: "Basic" chemistry

Chenery, Simon RN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:08:03 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

Thallium carry over/wash out

Thallium carry over/wash out

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:25:27 +0930

48 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

Glenn Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:03:33 -0600

77 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:09 -0400

105 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

Carrier,Jacques [Burlington] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:14:09 -0400

65 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:44:59 +0930

90 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:48:51 +0930

117 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:55:05 +1000

127 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:39:02 +0930

168 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:46:18 +1000

149 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:18:07 +0930

175 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:56:26 +1000

206 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:28:22 +0930

218 lines

Re: Thallium carry over/wash out

Carrier,Jacques [Burlington] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:24:54 -0400

135 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

unsubscribe [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

BLAGOJEVIC, Ned <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:23:56 +1000

73 lines

New Thread

Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Sherri N. Singer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:54:46 -0400

15 lines

Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Sherri N. Singer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:46:35 -0400

20 lines

Re: Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Robert Valade <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:55:42 -0400

53 lines

Re: Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:02:35 -0400

40 lines

Re: Vials for the Agilent I-AS

Os, Bertil van <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:00:19 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Wake up, the matrix has you. Follow the white rabbit. Knock knock...

Re: Wake up, the matrix has you. Follow the white rabbit. Knock knock...

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:43:06 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

Where do you find meaning in your work?

Where do you find meaning in your work?

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:44:40 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Catherine Chauvel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:39:08 +0200

37 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:47:54 +0300

51 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

John Zvimba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:57:56 +0200

74 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Jesse Moyo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:04:39 +0200

107 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Jesse Moyo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:12:50 +0200

137 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:20:38 +1000

169 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Jörg Hansmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:53:42 +0200

78 lines

Re: Who knows and has used a ContrAA 700

Schurter, Lynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:54:31 -0400

86 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager