LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PLASMACHEM-L Archives


PLASMACHEM-L Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry (2 messages)
4500 plasma (1 message)
7500 CRC cleaning (4 messages)
a new question (1 message)
Administrative: Have a job opening vs looking for a job (1 message)
advise on two ICP-optical systems (1 message)
Ag recovery in 2% TAA matrix (3 messages)
authors sought (1 message)
AW: Laser ablation: damaged windows (1 message)
AW: Potassium carryover (1 message)
Bismuth in Soils (6 messages)
call for abstracts, 2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry (1 message)
copyrighjt question (2 messages)
copyright question (6 messages)
dissolving of coal fly ash (6 messages)
EPA 200.2 inconsistency and stability of metal species (1 message)
Exhaust for Agilent 7500 (20 messages)
Final Announcement: 'Lunar Geochemistry and Chronology' at Goldschmidt - abstract reminder (1 message)
Further to: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port? (1 message)
FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port? (10 messages)
Hexane analysis for Si via ICP (7 messages)
Hexane analysis for Si via RA-ICP-OES (2 messages)
High RSD in no gas mode (5 messages)
ICP Equipment Available (2 messages)
ICP for Sale (1 message)
ICP-MS on a chip? (1 message)
ICP-MS on a ship? (10 messages)
In the Lead Analysis (1 message)
Interelement Corrections - ICP (2 messages)
Internal standard (1 message)
Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters (10 messages)
Iron/chromium oxide digestion help (4 messages)
Isoprobe boot disk (5 messages)
Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms (7 messages)
Lead Analysis (4 messages)
Lead Analysis - find another lab (1 message)
looking for contract lab to do silicone in MIBK (3 messages)
low counts/ sensitivity (3 messages)
MC-ICP-MS job opportunity at Natural Resources Canada (1 message)
Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port? (11 messages)
Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport? (8 messages)
Optima 2100 plasma will not light. (7 messages)
Osmium at altitude (4 messages)
Osmium with attitude (1 message)
plasma on Agilent 4500 not lighting (1 message)
Plasma turn off (2 messages)
Please remove (2 messages)
Post-Doc Position for LA-ICP-MS research in nuclear (1 message)
Potassium carryover (7 messages)
PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361 (5 messages)
PQ2 on ebay (1 message)
Preconcentration procedure for low level cadmium analysis in rice grain and plant material by ICP-OES (2 messages)
pyrite oxidation (6 messages)
RE : Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port? (1 message)
REE standard reference materials (3 messages)
Response to question about high background signal (1 message)
Running an Optima 7000 (1 message)
Searching for Agilent 4500 ICP-MS units (1 message)
Si in Organics with NO interference (1 message)
silicon measurement basics (11 messages)
strange counts (7 messages)
Strange high background intensity in ICP-MS (1 message)
titanium oxide dissolution (7 messages)
ultrapure water systems (1 message)
valves and volatile analytes (1 message)
water purification system feedback (1 message)
Who owns Micromass (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Home

PLASMACHEM-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry

2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry

River-NTU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:10:00 +0800

40 lines

Re: 2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:38:36 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

4500 plasma

4500 plasma

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:43:19 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

7500 CRC cleaning

7500 CRC cleaning

Moore,Adrienne M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:00:00 -0500

38 lines

Re: 7500 CRC cleaning

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:46:23 -0500

85 lines

Re: 7500 CRC cleaning

Glenn Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:14:44 -0700

112 lines

Re: 7500 CRC cleaning

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:17:19 +1300

154 lines

New Thread

a new question

a new question

Upp, Linda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:54:26 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Administrative: Have a job opening vs looking for a job

Administrative: Have a job opening vs looking for a job

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:51:30 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

advise on two ICP-optical systems

advise on two ICP-optical systems

Michel van den Brink - 3ME <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:31:20 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Ag recovery in 2% TAA matrix

Ag recovery in 2% TAA matrix

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:34:12 -0500

82 lines

Re: Ag recovery in 2% TAA matrix

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:03:53 -0500

127 lines

Re: Ag recovery in 2% TAA matrix

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:53:43 +1000

155 lines

New Thread

authors sought

Re: authors sought

Tom Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:52:31 -0500

185 lines

New Thread

AW: Laser ablation: damaged windows

AW: Laser ablation: damaged windows

Joachim Nölte <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:09:59 +0100

126 lines

New Thread

AW: Potassium carryover

AW: Potassium carryover

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:26:22 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Bismuth in Soils

Re: Bismuth in Soils

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:08:51 -0500

78 lines

Re: Bismuth in Soils

Burnham, Marcus (NDM) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:28:32 -0500

80 lines

Re: Bismuth in Soils

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:18:27 -0700

70 lines

Re: Bismuth in Soils

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:35:55 -0500

97 lines

Re: Bismuth in Soils

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:38:30 -0500

95 lines

Re: Bismuth in Soils

Burnham, Marcus (NDM) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:26:33 -0500

165 lines

New Thread

call for abstracts, 2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry

call for abstracts, 2009 AOGS session SE51 Advancesw in Analytical Geochemistry

River-NTU <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:07:13 +0800

21 lines

New Thread

copyrighjt question

copyrighjt question

Tom Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:08:39 -0500

26 lines

Re: copyrighjt question

Holser, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:29:54 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

copyright question

copyright question

Robert G. Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:35:29 -0500

65 lines

Re: copyright question

Tom Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:48:04 -0500

81 lines

copyright question

Robert G. Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:55:31 -0500

47 lines

Re: copyright question

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:15:49 -0600

69 lines

Re: copyright question

Thomas J Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:02:24 -0500

86 lines

Re: copyright question

Eileen Skelly Frame <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:18:42 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

dissolving of coal fly ash

dissolving of coal fly ash

Collins, Roxanne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:39:07 -0500

29 lines

Re: dissolving of coal fly ash

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:11 -0500

84 lines

Re: dissolving of coal fly ash

John Northrop <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:28:49 -0500

134 lines

Re: dissolving of coal fly ash

George Kamenov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:33:25 -0500

54 lines

Re: dissolving of coal fly ash

J. Michael Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:58:41 -0600

72 lines

Re: dissolving of coal fly ash

Tom Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:54:59 -0600

60 lines

New Thread

EPA 200.2 inconsistency and stability of metal species

Re: EPA 200.2 inconsistency and stability of metal species

Louis Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:52:01 -0500

129 lines

New Thread

Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Javier Seravalli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:43:03 -0600

25 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:57:48 +1100

53 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Javier Seravalli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:00:24 -0600

90 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Bernholtz, Steve G <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:30:42 -0600

117 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Javier Seravalli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:39:41 -0600

153 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:53:09 +1100

158 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Bernholtz, Steve G <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:59:50 -0600

183 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Javier Seravalli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:09:24 -0600

226 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Ed Heithmar <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:45:17 -0500

25 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Robert G. Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:15:00 -0500

57 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:47:07 -0800

43 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:15:32 +1030

75 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:55:53 +1100

82 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:36:26 +1000

108 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:56:49 -0700

51 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:35:41 -0600

133 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Javier Seravalli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:45:02 -0600

166 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:31:52 -0600

198 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Javier Seravalli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:41:50 -0600

230 lines

Re: Exhaust for Agilent 7500

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:51:14 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Final Announcement: 'Lunar Geochemistry and Chronology' at Goldschmidt - abstract reminder

Final Announcement: 'Lunar Geochemistry and Chronology' at Goldschmidt - abstract reminder

Vera Assis Fernandes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:31:27 -0800

93 lines

New Thread

Further to: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Further to: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:18:55 +1100

200 lines

New Thread

FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Damien Phelan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:51:01 +0900

56 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:15:52 +1100

47 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:04:11 -0800

77 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:09:02 -0800

55 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

McShane, William J <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:30:44 -0500

86 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Francis OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:10:41 -0800

124 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:32:05 -0500

188 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:04:12 -0800

108 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:00:02 -0800

70 lines

Re: FW: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:56:25 +1300

49 lines

New Thread

Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

Bozena Wojdyla <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:22:30 -0500

18 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

Upp, Linda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:38:52 -0500

42 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:03:28 -0800

56 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

James Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:13:57 -0500

45 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

Pamela Wee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:35:40 -0500

80 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

Gary Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:15:53 -0500

111 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via ICP

Pamela Wee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:05:39 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

Hexane analysis for Si via RA-ICP-OES

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via RA-ICP-OES

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:29:23 -0500

62 lines

Re: Hexane analysis for Si via RA-ICP-OES

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:55:58 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

High RSD in no gas mode

High RSD in no gas mode

Boyles, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:45:31 -0800

33 lines

Re: High RSD in no gas mode

Jeni A. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:06:51 -0700

81 lines

Re: High RSD in no gas mode

Chai, Yingtao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:59:35 -0600

57 lines

Re: High RSD in no gas mode

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:25:04 +1300

80 lines

Re: High RSD in no gas mode

Boyles, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:43:59 -0800

103 lines

New Thread

ICP Equipment Available

ICP Equipment Available

Ramon Barnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:08:05 -0500

38 lines

Re: ICP Equipment Available

Robert S Houk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:33:59 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

ICP for Sale

ICP for Sale

Nate O'Neill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:37:26 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

ICP-MS on a chip?

Re: ICP-MS on a chip?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:11:49 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

ICP-MS on a ship?

ICP-MS on a ship?

Jan Kosler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:01:11 +0100

27 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:15:19 -0500

59 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:25:44 +1100

54 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:58:46 +1000

87 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

Stewart Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:33:50 +1030

95 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:48:01 -0500

71 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

Emmanuel PONZEVERA <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:10:31 +0100

53 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

McShane, William J <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:25:23 -0500

82 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:58:47 -0500

108 lines

Re: ICP-MS on a ship?

McShane, William J <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:39:16 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

In the Lead Analysis

Re: In the Lead Analysis

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:53:32 -0500

170 lines

New Thread

Interelement Corrections - ICP

Interelement Corrections - ICP

Kevin Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:31:28 -0500

47 lines

Re: Interelement Corrections - ICP

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:47:38 -0500

129 lines

New Thread

Internal standard

Internal standard

Tumelo Sepeng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:59:55 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Nathan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:13:30 -0600

31 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:29:10 -0500

67 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Robert Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:48:48 -0600

50 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:49:09 -0500

63 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Tomas Magna <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:34:22 +0100

51 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:27:04 -0600

37 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Tomas Magna <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:25:53 +0100

83 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Isaac Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:42:52 +0200

206 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:30:36 -0500

71 lines

Re: Internal standard choice for Li in natural waters

Tomas Magna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:26:21 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

Iron/chromium oxide digestion help

Iron/chromium oxide digestion help

Matt Seguin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:50:10 -0500

17 lines

Re: Iron/chromium oxide digestion help

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:07:08 -0500

68 lines

Re: Iron/chromium oxide digestion help

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:09:29 -0600

52 lines

Re: Iron/chromium oxide digestion help

Isaac Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:12:08 +0200

78 lines

New Thread

Isoprobe boot disk

Isoprobe boot disk

Vincent Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:24:42 -0500

26 lines

Re: Isoprobe boot disk

McShane, William J <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:01:35 -0500

54 lines

Re: Isoprobe boot disk

Walter, Peter (NIH/NIDDK) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:12:48 -0500

81 lines

Re: Isoprobe boot disk

Martin Fleisher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:55:48 -0500

102 lines

Re: Isoprobe boot disk

Vincent Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:23:37 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

River-NTU <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:03:59 +0800

29 lines

Re: Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

+ Vinay Naik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:01:12 +0530

48 lines

Re: Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

Maite Aramendía <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:57:43 +0100

94 lines

Re: Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

Rob Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:11:18 -0500

34 lines

Re: Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

Rob Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:34:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

Rob Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:37:53 -0500

41 lines

Re: Laser ablation: New Wave 193FX vs Photo-machine Analyte 193H for LA-icpms

Vinay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:20:19 +0530

63 lines

New Thread

Lead Analysis

Lead Analysis

Jannell Rowe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:30:29 -0500

35 lines

Re: Lead Analysis

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:14:55 -0500

98 lines

Re: Lead Analysis

Rowe, Jannell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:41:40 -0500

124 lines

Re: Lead Analysis

Pamela Wee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:43:09 -0500

173 lines

New Thread

Lead Analysis - find another lab

Re: Lead Analysis - find another lab

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:43:33 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

looking for contract lab to do silicone in MIBK

looking for contract lab to do silicone in MIBK

Upp, Linda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:34:21 -0500

48 lines

Re: looking for contract lab to do silicone in MIBK

Ming Yu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:52:24 -0800

67 lines

Re: looking for contract lab to do silicone in MIBK

Nancy Lewen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:13:06 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

low counts/ sensitivity

low counts/ sensitivity

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:09:32 -0600

37 lines

Re: low counts/ sensitivity

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:49:51 -0600

90 lines

Re: low counts/ sensitivity

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:49:39 -0600

105 lines

New Thread

MC-ICP-MS job opportunity at Natural Resources Canada

MC-ICP-MS job opportunity at Natural Resources Canada

Jackson, Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:56:27 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:42:12 -0500

31 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:28:02 -0500

66 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Francis OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:31:06 -0500

93 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:24:06 +1100

129 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:20:18 +1300

177 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Pamela Wee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:46:07 -0500

189 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:11:52 -0500

225 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:18:24 +1100

214 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:01:23 +1000

207 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:23:50 +1100

189 lines

Re: Medical Stainless, not copper: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Pamela Wee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:27:43 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Francis OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:29:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Vestal Shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:06:26 -0500

40 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Francis OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:14:09 -0500

61 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Lahner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:23:48 -0500

83 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Mercurio, Randy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:27:14 -0500

99 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Francis OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 15:16:27 -0500

119 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

michael murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:39:31 -0800

93 lines

Re: Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon transport?

Stephen Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:51:30 +1100

41 lines

New Thread

Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Richard Hoskins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:11:56 -0500

30 lines

Re: Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Kin-Chung Lam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:25:25 -0500

69 lines

Re: Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Nathan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:42:08 -0600

87 lines

Re: Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:55:32 -0800

43 lines

Re: Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Boyles, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:57:07 -0800

57 lines

Re: Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:27:11 -0600

71 lines

Re: Optima 2100 plasma will not light.

Ronald Janssen Intertek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:38:17 -0700

102 lines

New Thread

Osmium at altitude

Osmium at altitude

Ronald Janssen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:45:02 -0500

21 lines

Re: Osmium at altitude

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:11:56 +1000

62 lines

Re: Osmium at altitude

Ronald Janssen Intertek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:17:49 -0700

101 lines

Re: Osmium at altitude

michael murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:13:04 -0800

58 lines

New Thread

Osmium with attitude

Re: Osmium with attitude

Marc Norman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:18:19 +1100

43 lines

New Thread

plasma on Agilent 4500 not lighting

plasma on Agilent 4500 not lighting

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:06:50 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Plasma turn off

Plasma turn off

william wong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:33:42 +0800

23 lines

Re: Plasma turn off

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:46:09 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Please remove

Please remove

Xiaojing Li <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:01:27 -0500

17 lines

Re: Please remove

Michael Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:23:10 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Post-Doc Position for LA-ICP-MS research in nuclear

Post-Doc Position for LA-ICP-MS research in nuclear

Stefaan Van Winckel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:34:20 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Potassium carryover

Potassium carryover

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:04:50 -0600

29 lines

Re: Potassium carryover

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:43:42 -0600

41 lines

Re: Potassium carryover

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:38:12 -0500

84 lines

Re: Potassium carryover

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:32:28 -0600

90 lines

Re: Potassium carryover

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:54:06 +1000

131 lines

Re: Potassium carryover

Brenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:14:27 +0200

53 lines

Re: Potassium carryover

Joachim Nölte <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:23:40 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361

PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361

Anthony Palermo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:07:16 -0500

28 lines

Re: PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:26:52 -0500

60 lines

Re: PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361

Lazarski, Peter M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:18:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361

Paul Field <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:43:04 -0500

70 lines

Re: PQ2 needs turbo pump, Leybold - TMP361

Andrew Toms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:52:21 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

PQ2 on ebay

PQ2 on ebay

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:36:29 +1100

32 lines

New Thread

Preconcentration procedure for low level cadmium analysis in rice grain and plant material by ICP-OES

Preconcentration procedure for low level cadmium analysis in rice grain and plant material by ICP-OES

Molina, Lilia (IRRI) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:58:29 +0800

60 lines

Re: Preconcentration procedure for low level cadmium analysis in rice grain and plant material by ICP-OES

zaidi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:47:52 +0300

97 lines

New Thread

pyrite oxidation

pyrite oxidation

Corey Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:29:31 -0500

36 lines

Re: pyrite oxidation

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:50:38 -0500

61 lines

Re: pyrite oxidation

Jason Day <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:48:51 +0000

40 lines

Re: pyrite oxidation

Corey Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:13:12 -0500

69 lines

Re: pyrite oxidation

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:56:54 -0500

66 lines

Re: pyrite oxidation

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:12:22 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

RE : Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

RE : Most suitable laboratory tubing for argon trans port?

Gilles Paillard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:09:55 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

REE standard reference materials

REE standard reference materials

Robert Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:22:16 -0500

21 lines

Re: REE standard reference materials

aloisio cotta <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:52:44 -0800

60 lines

Re: REE standard reference materials

Jason Day <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:07:52 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Response to question about high background signal

Re: Response to question about high background signal

侯振辉 <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:48:59 +0800

53 lines

New Thread

Running an Optima 7000

Running an Optima 7000

Stephen Chace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:52:08 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Searching for Agilent 4500 ICP-MS units

Searching for Agilent 4500 ICP-MS units

Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:40:59 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

Si in Organics with NO interference

Re: Si in Organics with NO interference

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:58:17 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

silicon measurement basics

silicon measurement basics

Arndt Weiske <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:05:37 -0500

52 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:36:59 -0500

111 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:38:37 -0500

84 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:56:48 -0500

138 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Arndt Weiske <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:05:36 -0500

20 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Arndt Weiske <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:16:31 -0500

17 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:30:51 -0500

69 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Sarah Bureau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:48:44 +0100

92 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Nick Valckx <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:15:17 -0500

63 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

Pamela Wee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:23:45 -0500

33 lines

Re: silicon measurement basics

McShane, William J <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:25:23 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

strange counts

strange counts

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:15:24 -0600

34 lines

Re: strange counts

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:19:08 -0500

70 lines

Re: strange counts

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:43:36 -0600

83 lines

Re: strange counts

Parsons, Jason G <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:45:37 -0700

64 lines

Re: strange counts

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:09:52 -0600

75 lines

Re: strange counts

Sampson, Barry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:49:03 +0000

100 lines

Re: strange counts

Mori Atobatele <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:14:41 -0600

114 lines

New Thread

Strange high background intensity in ICP-MS

Strange high background intensity in ICP-MS

侯振辉 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:49:19 +0800

23 lines

New Thread

titanium oxide dissolution

titanium oxide dissolution

Corey Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:07:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: titanium oxide dissolution

Laurie Ottmar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:14:42 -0500

89 lines

Re: titanium oxide dissolution

John A. Anzelmo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:29:50 -0500

147 lines

Re: titanium oxide dissolution

Robert Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:57:57 +0000

51 lines

Re: titanium oxide dissolution

Laurie Ottmar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:34:37 -0500

209 lines

Re: titanium oxide dissolution

Laurie Ottmar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:45:49 -0500

29 lines

Re: titanium oxide dissolution

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:20:59 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

ultrapure water systems

ultrapure water systems

Justin Glessner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:34:26 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

valves and volatile analytes

valves and volatile analytes

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:01:14 +1000

63 lines

New Thread

water purification system feedback

water purification system feedback

Francis OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:19:43 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Who owns Micromass

Who owns Micromass

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:23:38 -0500

130 lines

Re: Who owns Micromass

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:43:54 -0500

155 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager