LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PLASMACHEM-L Archives


PLASMACHEM-L Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Archives


February 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Admin: Lotus Notes (6 messages)
Admin: Lotus Notes follow-up (1 message)
Aluminium in vaccine (3 messages)
Aluminum in vaccine (1 message)
Aluminum Urine (1 message)
Aluminum Urine and other things (1 message)
Announcement of PittCon Short Course (1 message)
Another 7500 computer question (6 messages)
Antw: Re: argon line (3 messages)
argon line (3 messages)
Atomscam 16 spay chamber (1 message)
AW: Atomscam 16 spay chamber (1 message)
AW: Otolith CRMs (1 message)
AW: Post column flow splitter for IC (1 message)
Boron by ICP-MS (8 messages)
chiller enclosures (6 messages)
Class 10K vs 1K Clean labs (4 messages)
Cr Contamination Update (3 messages)
CRM for PGM in biologicals? (2 messages)
Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options (12 messages)
Dry static vs. Dewpoint humidity - which is worse? (1 message)
Error Code on Agilent 7500cx (7 messages)
ESI autosampler problem with Neptune (2 messages)
FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values (6 messages)
Fwd: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods (1 message)
FYI: A few citations that discuss or mention selenoproteins with ICP-MS (1 message)
Great static storm of 2011 (12 messages)
Great static storm of 2011 - Al foil is my friend today!!! (2 messages)
How much more Boron can this be by ICP-MS (1 message)
Internal Std tubing weights (11 messages)
Internal Std tubing weights - alternate approach (1 message)
Iodine interference (14 messages)
lab policy (5 messages)
lab policy - a few more questions. (3 messages)
Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software (5 messages)
Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues? (15 messages)
metals in peptides (9 messages)
otholith CRM (1 message)
Otolith CRMs (4 messages)
PE Optima 7300 DV (1 message)
Post column flow splitter for IC (6 messages)
productivity question (21 messages)
Quantification analysis on MC-ICP-MS (1 message)
Quantification analysis on MC-ICP-MS / A análise quantitativa em MC-ICP-MS (1 message)
SCP interlab survey soils (May 82) (3 messages)
SeaFast system for the analysis of REE in groundwaters [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (3 messages)
sem-quntitativ​e analyses of impurities in reagent AlCl3 (3 messages)
semi quntitative method for Au (4 messages)
Smoke test in cleanroom hoods (8 messages)
Soil standards (1 message)
Summer Internship in LA-ICP-MS (1 message)
Thanks and a Cr contamination question (11 messages)
Troubleshooting high RSDs (9 messages)
Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method (17 messages)
Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method 6 membered fraternity sigma pi pi (1 message)
Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a (7 messages)
uncertainty due to high blank digest conc. (5 messages)
Upcoming Conference Deadlines (1 message)
Zinc contamination (22 messages)
Zinc contamination and PE gloves (4 messages)
Zinc contamination: Water system? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLASMACHEM-L Home

PLASMACHEM-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Admin: Lotus Notes

Admin: Lotus Notes

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:49:02 -0500

35 lines

Re: Admin: Lotus Notes

Ed Heithmar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:12:26 -0800

61 lines

Re: Admin: Lotus Notes

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:02:57 -0600

50 lines

Re: Admin: Lotus Notes

Lars Frøsig Østergaard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:21:45 +0100

87 lines

Re: Admin: Lotus Notes

Barbara R Gauthier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:18:53 -0500

61 lines

Re: Admin: Lotus Notes

Michael Kroc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:06:35 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Admin: Lotus Notes follow-up

Admin: Lotus Notes follow-up

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:14:30 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Aluminium in vaccine

Aluminium in vaccine

Ph. De Raeve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:45:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: Aluminium in vaccine

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:12:04 +0000

42 lines

Re: Aluminium in vaccine

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:39:37 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Aluminum in vaccine

Re: Aluminum in vaccine

Conver, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:49:11 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Aluminum Urine

Re: Aluminum Urine

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:58:25 -0600

161 lines

New Thread

Aluminum Urine and other things

Re: Aluminum Urine and other things

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:43:00 -0500

188 lines

New Thread

Announcement of PittCon Short Course

Announcement of PittCon Short Course

Robert Thomas(2) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:50:27 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

Another 7500 computer question

Another 7500 computer question

John Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:26:45 -0500

41 lines

Re: Another 7500 computer question

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:08:24 -0800

56 lines

Re: Another 7500 computer question

Scott Laidlaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:47:05 +1100

66 lines

Re: Another 7500 computer question

John Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:31:26 -0500

104 lines

Re: Another 7500 computer question

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:11:39 +1030

106 lines

Re: Another 7500 computer question

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:32:40 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: argon line

Antw: Re: argon line

Thomas Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:25:00 +0100

96 lines

Re: Antw: Re: argon line

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:17:53 -0800

63 lines

Re: Antw: Re: argon line

Rob Stainthorpe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:44:52 +1300

137 lines

New Thread

argon line

argon line

Pierre Labelle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:16:27 -0500

31 lines

Re: argon line

Lars Frøsig Østergaard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:08:20 +0100

81 lines

Re: argon line

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:13:30 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Atomscam 16 spay chamber

Re: Atomscam 16 spay chamber

Jack Rundel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:22:04 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

AW: Atomscam 16 spay chamber

AW: Atomscam 16 spay chamber

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:00:45 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

AW: Otolith CRMs

AW: Otolith CRMs

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:14:41 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

AW: Post column flow splitter for IC

AW: Post column flow splitter for IC

Michael Sperling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:40:20 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Boron by ICP-MS

Boron by ICP-MS

Holser, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:18:54 +0000

41 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

Steve Pulford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:41:04 -0700

85 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:32:59 -0500

122 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:27:22 -0800

150 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

Don Chipley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:12:32 -0500

73 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:38:27 -0800

164 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:40:58 -0600

232 lines

Re: Boron by ICP-MS

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:28:50 -0800

96 lines

New Thread

chiller enclosures

chiller enclosures

Ed Heithmar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:51:48 -0800

28 lines

Re: chiller enclosures

McShane, William J. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:07:42 -0700

55 lines

Re: chiller enclosures

Mike McColm <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:10:47 -0800

46 lines

Re: chiller enclosures

Greg Sparrow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:02:58 -0800

59 lines

Re: chiller enclosures

David Wray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:21:41 +0000

48 lines

Re: chiller enclosures

Ed Heithmar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:40:57 -0800

74 lines

New Thread

Class 10K vs 1K Clean labs

Class 10K vs 1K Clean labs

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:19:12 -0500

53 lines

Re: Class 10K vs 1K Clean labs

Randy Mercurio <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:00:08 -0500

84 lines

Re: Class 10K vs 1K Clean labs

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:28:15 +0000

86 lines

Re: Class 10K vs 1K Clean labs

Conver, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:45:56 -0500

85 lines

New Thread

Cr Contamination Update

Cr Contamination Update

John Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:07:21 -0500

37 lines

Re: Cr Contamination Update

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:14:36 -0600

57 lines

Re: Cr Contamination Update

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:58:12 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

CRM for PGM in biologicals?

CRM for PGM in biologicals?

Ain Raitsakas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:40:05 -0500

25 lines

Re: CRM for PGM in biologicals?

Richard Goldsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:11:13 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:03:39 -0500

49 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:56:09 +1300

94 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:48:08 +1000

97 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:39:40 -0500

76 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:08:02 +0000

98 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:36:37 -0500

113 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Higgins, Barry J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:53:27 -0600

72 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Larry Somraack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:34:03 +0000

69 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:55:29 -0800

68 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:29:22 +1000

81 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:13:14 +1100

105 lines

Re: Current thinking on Ar supply and pipe delivery options

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:37:20 +1000

139 lines

New Thread

Dry static vs. Dewpoint humidity - which is worse?

Re: Dry static vs. Dewpoint humidity - which is worse?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:16:10 +0000

70 lines

New Thread

Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Boyles, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:09:36 -0800

25 lines

Re: Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:17:54 -0700

70 lines

Re: Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:57:23 -0600

38 lines

Re: Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Guy Reggio <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:40:54 -0500

58 lines

Re: Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:50:51 -0600

69 lines

Re: Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:08:42 -0500

67 lines

Re: Error Code on Agilent 7500cx

Boyles, Matt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 07:14:56 -0800

87 lines

New Thread

ESI autosampler problem with Neptune

ESI autosampler problem with Neptune

Julien Foriel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:55:54 -0500

48 lines

Re: ESI autosampler problem with Neptune

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:31:04 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Re: FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Sandhya Devalla <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:49:41 -0000

82 lines

Re: FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:08:20 -0500

103 lines

Re: FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:21:48 -0700

141 lines

Re: FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Sandhya Devalla <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:04:10 -0000

192 lines

Re: FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Ed McCurdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:36:19 -0700

106 lines

Re: FW: Creation of '< det. limit' values

Sandhya Devalla <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:59:44 -0000

148 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Fwd: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:23:02 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

FYI: A few citations that discuss or mention selenoproteins with ICP-MS

FYI: A few citations that discuss or mention selenoproteins with ICP-MS

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:07:11 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Great static storm of 2011

Great static storm of 2011

Nathan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:15:30 -0600

37 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:31:06 -0500

78 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

James Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:41:30 -0500

58 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:46:19 -0800

69 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:51:12 -0500

71 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:53:40 -0500

108 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Schurter, Lynn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:00:50 -0500

91 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Randy Mercurio <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:20:05 -0500

64 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:26:44 -0800

22 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Gauthier Gilles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:10:38 -0500

158 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:42:17 -0500

180 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:49:00 -0700

183 lines

New Thread

Great static storm of 2011 - Al foil is my friend today!!!

Re: Great static storm of 2011 - Al foil is my friend today!!!

Nathan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:04:04 -0600

107 lines

Re: Great static storm of 2011 - Al foil is my friend today!!!

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:32 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

How much more Boron can this be by ICP-MS

Re: How much more Boron can this be by ICP-MS

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:21:54 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

Internal Std tubing weights

Internal Std tubing weights

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:16:35 +1300

150 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Nimal De Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:54:22 +0000

194 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:03:25 +0000

169 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

SIMIC Ilija <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:25:55 -0500

191 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:48:13 -0500

181 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Randy Mercurio <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:28:14 -0500

187 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:52:24 -0700

198 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:17:36 +1300

50 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

David Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:03:11 +1000

176 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Musante, Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:45:18 -0500

190 lines

Re: Internal Std tubing weights

Robinson, Lisa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:31:13 +0000

207 lines

New Thread

Internal Std tubing weights - alternate approach

Re: Internal Std tubing weights - alternate approach

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:42:55 -0500

219 lines

New Thread

Iodine interference

Iodine interference

Taylor, Joanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:09:51 -0800

57 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:25:04 -0600

70 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Taylor, Joanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:38:22 -0700

81 lines

Re: Iodine interference

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:59 -0500

93 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:49:11 +0000

84 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:22:51 -0600

106 lines

Re: Iodine interference

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:07:35 -0800

64 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Taylor, Joanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:51:39 -0800

95 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Dr. Henry Longerich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:01:45 -0330

44 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Dr. Henry Longerich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:03:47 -0330

28 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Denis Berube <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 06:58:22 -0500

172 lines

Re: Iodine interference

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:39:09 -0800

42 lines

Re: Iodine interference

Taylor, Joanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:15:58 -0800

93 lines

Re: Iodine interference

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:51 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

lab policy

lab policy

Vestal Shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:42:19 -0500

52 lines

Re: lab policy

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:53:20 -0600

66 lines

Re: lab policy

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:08:54 -0500

100 lines

Re: lab policy

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:19:36 -0500

125 lines

Re: lab policy

Barnes, Melanie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:26:19 -0600

150 lines

New Thread

lab policy - a few more questions.

lab policy - a few more questions.

Paul Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:04:19 -0500

97 lines

Re: lab policy - a few more questions.

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:30 -0600

130 lines

Re: lab policy - a few more questions.

David K. Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:18:22 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software

Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software

Ryan Bu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:14:52 -0600

18 lines

Re: Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software

Luigi Solari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:10:47 -0600

48 lines

Re: Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software

Alan Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:54:53 +1100

30 lines

Re: Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software

Vid Šelih <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:15:45 +0100

65 lines

Re: Laser ablation ICPMS imaging software

Alexei Plotnikov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:50:31 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:08:41 -0500

41 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Timothy Mock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:24:38 -0500

49 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Lev, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:45:18 +0000

71 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Higgins, Barry J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:53:24 -0600

58 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:02:13 -0600

80 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

O'Neil, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:02:33 +1030

136 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:18:47 -0800

85 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Sampson, Barry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:40:34 +0000

96 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Higgins, Barry J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:49:52 -0600

100 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:17:32 -0600

119 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:26:07 +0000

143 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Michael M Cheatham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:52:50 -0500

129 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:02:12 -0500

154 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:32:59 -0600

30 lines

Re: Mass Spectrometer detectors and Wi-Fi signals: interference issues?

Higgins, Barry J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:48:09 -0600

158 lines

New Thread

metals in peptides

Re: metals in peptides

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:38:21 +0000

98 lines

Re: metals in peptides

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:06:39 -0600

109 lines

Re: metals in peptides

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:47:46 -0500

136 lines

Re: metals in peptides

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:03:24 -0600

149 lines

Re: metals in peptides

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:34:28 -0500

173 lines

Re: metals in peptides

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:52:39 -0600

196 lines

Re: metals in peptides

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:13:06 +0000

72 lines

Re: metals in peptides

McShane, William J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:28:14 -0700

66 lines

Re: metals in peptides

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:15:20 -0500

228 lines

New Thread

otholith CRM

otholith CRM

Christian Dietz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:55:29 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Otolith CRMs

Otolith CRMs

Dr Leon J. Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:46:29 +0000

31 lines

Re: Otolith CRMs

Chen, Zhongxing <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:14:55 -0500

77 lines

Re: Otolith CRMs

Karen Spaleta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:42:56 -0900

52 lines

Re: Otolith CRMs

Andy H. Shen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:02:26 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

PE Optima 7300 DV

PE Optima 7300 DV

Tom Let <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:49:17 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Post column flow splitter for IC

Post column flow splitter for IC

Liyan Xing <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:52:12 -0500

34 lines

Re: Post column flow splitter for IC

Nimal De Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:42:34 +0000

108 lines

Re: Post column flow splitter for IC

Liyan Xing <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:19:56 -0500

109 lines

Re: Post column flow splitter for IC

Liyan Xing <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:31:15 -0500

148 lines

Re: Post column flow splitter for IC

Rob Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:17 -0800

124 lines

Re: Post column flow splitter for IC

Nimal De Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:14:47 +0000

192 lines

New Thread

productivity question

productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:09:24 -0600

61 lines

Re: productivity question

Richard Goldsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:28:30 -0500

81 lines

Re: productivity question

Huo, Dengwei (GNF) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:34:14 -0500

138 lines

Re: productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:55:03 -0600

38 lines

Re: productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:16:22 -0600

35 lines

Re: productivity question

Richard Goldsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500

58 lines

Re: productivity question

Tom Let <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:13:03 -0800

92 lines

Re: productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:36:43 -0600

125 lines

Re: productivity question

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:54:00 -0500

126 lines

Re: productivity question

Tom Let <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:04:25 -0800

148 lines

Re: productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:19:31 -0600

39 lines

Re: productivity question

Tom Let <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:22:33 -0800

161 lines

Re: productivity question

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:22:57 -0500

196 lines

Re: productivity question

Mary Bumgarner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:42:42 -0500

222 lines

Re: productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:07:17 -0600

38 lines

Re: productivity question

Roxann Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:09:41 -0600

71 lines

Re: productivity question

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:15:11 -0800

100 lines

Re: productivity question

Pierre Labelle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:58:22 -0500

88 lines

Re: productivity question

Nimal De Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:36:34 +0000

140 lines

Re: productivity question

Bernhard Schnetger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:07:12 +0100

167 lines

Re: productivity question

Huo, Dengwei (GNF) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:50:30 -0500

214 lines

New Thread

Quantification analysis on MC-ICP-MS

Quantification analysis on MC-ICP-MS

Rui Santos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:12:21 -0000

42 lines

New Thread

Quantification analysis on MC-ICP-MS / A análise quantitativa em MC-ICP-MS

Re: Quantification analysis on MC-ICP-MS / A análise quantitativa em MC-ICP-MS

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:04:56 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

SCP interlab survey soils (May 82)

SCP interlab survey soils (May 82)

Dr Leon J. Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:24:36 +0000

39 lines

Re: SCP interlab survey soils (May 82)

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:14:14 -0500

79 lines

Re: SCP interlab survey soils (May 82)

Tom Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:54:58 -0800

78 lines

New Thread

SeaFast system for the analysis of REE in groundwaters [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

SeaFast system for the analysis of REE in groundwaters [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

CENDON SEVILLA, Dioni <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:17:42 +1100

63 lines

Re: SeaFast system for the analysis of REE in groundwaters [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Paul Field <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:29:06 -0500

85 lines

Re: SeaFast system for the analysis of REE in groundwaters [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Juan Pablo Bernal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:29:50 -0600

85 lines

New Thread

sem-quntitativ​e analyses of impurities in reagent AlCl3

sem-quntitativ​e analyses of impurities in reagent AlCl3

Lily Zhao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:39:02 -0800

38 lines

Re: sem-quntitativ​e analyses of impurities in reagent AlCl3

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:55:21 +0000

51 lines

Re: sem-quntitativ​e analyses of impurities in reagent AlCl3

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:15:17 -0800

89 lines

New Thread

semi quntitative method for Au

semi quntitative method for Au

Hadi Karbasi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:45:52 -0500

34 lines

Re: semi quntitative method for Au

Naresh Bachoo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:03:04 +0200

59 lines

Re: semi quntitative method for Au

Tumelo Sepeng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:08:58 +0200

52 lines

Re: semi quntitative method for Au

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:48:35 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Paul Bedard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:51:20 -0500

25 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:23:51 -0600

35 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Conver, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:54:24 -0500

37 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Neil Dickey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:42:24 -0600

30 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:58:32 +1100

54 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Paul Bedard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:47:05 -0500

43 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:20:14 +1100

83 lines

Re: Smoke test in cleanroom hoods

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:22:35 -0600

107 lines

New Thread

Soil standards

Soil standards

Dr Leon J. Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:51:25 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Summer Internship in LA-ICP-MS

Summer Internship in LA-ICP-MS

Rob Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:28:49 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Thanks and a Cr contamination question

John Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:57:43 -0500

43 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:18:17 +0000

70 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

McShane, William J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:49:02 -0700

79 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

McShane, William J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:50:10 -0700

91 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Burnham, Marcus (MNDMF) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:11:54 -0500

109 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:26:45 -0600

62 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Mindak, William R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:43:23 -0500

88 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

John Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:22:44 -0500

161 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Anastasia K Skipor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:46:15 +0000

64 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:43:48 -0500

191 lines

Re: Thanks and a Cr contamination question

Guy Reggio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:17:37 -0500

222 lines

New Thread

Troubleshooting high RSDs

Troubleshooting high RSDs

Mary Kay Amistadi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:39:10 -0500

31 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Steve Wilbur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:49:02 -0700

54 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Michela Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:50:22 -0800

83 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:52:41 +0000

42 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:52:46 -0600

54 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Mary Kay Amistadi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:42:43 -0500

37 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:21:59 -0600

53 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Mary Kay Amistadi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:41:16 -0500

23 lines

Re: Troubleshooting high RSDs

Karen Spaleta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:44:19 -0900

50 lines

New Thread

Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:21:22 -0800

18 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:25:08 +0000

52 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:11 -0500

70 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:58:56 -0500

90 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:14:55 -0600

86 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:17:03 -0500

112 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:30:18 +0000

104 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:18:06 -0600

45 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:33:57 -0800

38 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:33:11 +0000

71 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:54:07 -0500

123 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:38:47 -0800

33 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:30:38 -0500

55 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:49:28 -0600

64 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Nimal De Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:27:43 +0000

102 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:39:49 +0000

90 lines

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:56:39 -0800

129 lines

New Thread

Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method 6 membered fraternity sigma pi pi

Re: Tungsten Hexacarbonyl Digestion Method 6 membered fraternity sigma pi pi

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:27:02 +0000

158 lines

New Thread

Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:53:52 -0600

33 lines

Re: Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Guy Reggio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:45:00 -0500

65 lines

Re: Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Pierre Labelle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:57:02 -0500

52 lines

Re: Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:32:36 -0500

56 lines

Re: Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Jay Tompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:11:42 -0600

39 lines

Re: Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:19:34 -0800

38 lines

Re: Tuning solution Li high RSD on 7500a

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:00:52 -0600

84 lines

New Thread

uncertainty due to high blank digest conc.

uncertainty due to high blank digest conc.

Gene E Weeks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:50:37 +0000

29 lines

Re: uncertainty due to high blank digest conc.

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:11:47 -0500

51 lines

Re: uncertainty due to high blank digest conc.

HERRMANN Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:43:21 -0500

95 lines

Re: uncertainty due to high blank digest conc.

ZDANOWICZ, VINCENT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:30:32 -0500

98 lines

Re: uncertainty due to high blank digest conc.

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:29:46 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

Upcoming Conference Deadlines

Upcoming Conference Deadlines

Steven Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:56:23 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Zinc contamination

Zinc contamination

Bobal, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:44:54 -0500

37 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:05:06 +0000

60 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Danillo Santos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:13:08 -0300

71 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

David Wray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:25:18 +0000

72 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Michael Shelley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:32:46 +1100

64 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Bobal, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:36:10 -0500

93 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Bobal, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:48:50 -0500

100 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:07:21 -0600

52 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

mohammad hadi karbasi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:07:48 -0800

61 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Pierre Labelle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:09:43 -0500

119 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:51:50 -0600

80 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:54:33 -0700

92 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Drew, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:57:01 -0700

101 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Bobal, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:14:08 -0500

106 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Dobney Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:24:33 +0100

73 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Matt Jahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:30:05 -0800

114 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

COOKE Jennifer (AREVA) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:37:13 -0500

81 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Bobal, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:37:03 -0500

76 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Duane Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:50:07 -0600

84 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

DeWitt Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:39:33 -0800

71 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

Bobal, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:41:02 -0500

93 lines

Re: Zinc contamination

SMoney (Steve) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:26:29 +1300

203 lines

New Thread

Zinc contamination and PE gloves

Zinc contamination and PE gloves

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:35:55 -0500

31 lines

Re: Zinc contamination and PE gloves

Randy Mercurio <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:47:33 -0500

68 lines

Re: Zinc contamination and PE gloves

Johan Schijf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:29:53 -0500

91 lines

Re: Zinc contamination and PE gloves

Harold VanSickle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:55:56 -0700

135 lines

New Thread

Zinc contamination: Water system?

Re: Zinc contamination: Water system?

Pappas, Richard Steve (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:30:37 +0000

97 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager