On 20 Sep 2007, at 2:00 PM, Carlos Afonso wrote:
> I guess this is the proposal from Rader you were looking for.

Carlos, many thanks for this.  I read it and wish it helped.

What has this to do with what I think I was disagreeing with, i.e.:

Begin forwarded message:
> I am asking ALL NCUC members to express their opinion on this by  
> replying to this email. Just check one of the two boxes. Add  
> comments if you have any.
>
> NCUC should respond to the Draft Staff Report on Whois by  
> expressing its support for Motion #3 contained in the report. That  
> motion declares that there is no consensus on existing Whois policy  
> and asks that the Whois portions of the Registrar Accreditation  
> Agreement be "sunsetted" (i.e., expired) at the end of 2008. This  
> motion should NOT be withdrawn if Motion #1 passes.
I cannot work out what motion #3 is....

What has Ross's proposal got to do with the Draft Staff Report on Whois?

This is complicated.... and hence why my email was not a simple agree/ 
disagree. Maybe someone can help me locate my opinion within the  
quagmire of documents and views on the whois. I guess this is why I  
struggle to participate in ncuc is a useful way. My sincere apologies.

Warm regards,

Alan







>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Ross Rader's resolution on WHOIS
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:57:19 -0400
> From: Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> MM: What this means is that the default value becomes "no whois
> requirement at all" until and unless we can agree on a consensus  
> policy
> regarding Whois. This was how ICANN was supposed to work - no policy
> without consensus.
>
>
> Whereas;
>
> 1.    The GNSO Council accepts the WG report and appreciates the  
> efforts
> made by WG participants and ICANN staff in preparing this report.
> 2.    The GNSO Council does not consider the WG report as sufficiently
> demonstrating consensus or agreement on substantive policy proposals.
> 3.    The GNSO Council considers that the lack of consensus  
> demonstrated
> through this open and inclusive working group is representative of the
> lack of agreement on key issues in this area of policy.
> 4.    The GNSO Council recognizes that there is no standing consensus
> policy concerning the management of the Whois service and data  
> provided
> to the public through that service by ICANN's contracted commercial
> operators, the registries and registrars. save and except the Whois  
> Data
> Reminder Policy and the Whois Marketing Restriction Policy.
>
> Therefore;
>
> Be it resolved;
>
> a) that the GNSO Council concludes the current PDP on Whois.
> b) graciously thanks all of the volunteers, consultants, staff and
> others who have participated in the GNSO's examination of Whois policy
> over the last four years.
> c) that the GNSO Council makes no specific policy recommendation to  
> the
> ICANN board at this time concerning Whois or related policy.
> d) that the GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN staff and Board of
> Directors that due to the lack of consensus on issues in this area  
> that
> current contractual requirements concerning Whois for registries,
> registrars and registrants that are not supported by consensus  
> policy be
> eliminated from the current operating agreements between ICANN and its
> contracted parties until such time that consensus policy in this area
> has been developed.
>
>
>
>
>
> Milton Mueller, Professor
> Syracuse University
> School of Information Studies
> ------------------------------
> Internet Governance Project:
> http://internetgovernance.org
> ------------------------------
> The Convergence Center:
> http://www.digitalconvergence.org
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.12/979 - Release Date:  
> 29/8/2007 20:21
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Carlos A. Afonso
> Rio       Brasil
> ***************************************************************
> Projeto Sacix - Apoio técnico a iniciativas de inclusão digital
> com software livre, mantido pela Rits em colaboração com o
> Coletivo Digital. Para mais informações:
> www.sacix.org.br   www.rits.org.br   www.coletivodigital.org.br
> ***************************************************************
>
>

-- 
Alan Levin - Chairman
Internet Society of South Africa



-- 
Alan Levin - Chairman
Internet Society of South Africa