 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:50:21 +0200 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good point. Perhaps the candidates could indicate whether they are
available for both terms, when they accept the nomination?
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, at 12:44 [=GMT-0400], Milton Mueller wrote:
> Well, there may be candidates who are most popular, but don't
> WANT to commit themselves to a 2 year term.
>
> >>> Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]> 10/16/03 12:32PM >>>
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, at 12:25 [=GMT-0400], Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> > Please note that in electing people to Council,
> > we must elect one representative to a one-year term
> > and the other to a two-year term:
>
> Unless we can think of any better method, we might let the candidate
> with the most votes take the longer term.
>
>
>
|
|
|
