NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 22:08:09 -0500
Reply-To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCUC Project--Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
>>> Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]> 11/07/03 06:58PM >>>
>It is not that I refuse to see the point. What I refuse is to be
>tricked into agreeing to a set of leading questions (in lieu of a
>proper problem description), based on an incident that has only
>vaguely to do with the issue of the PDP. The conclusion of the whole
>thing should be that Verisign tricked us into a topic that has nothing
>to do with Sitefinder, because it is _not_ a new service, but an abuse
>of an old service.

VeriSign did not propose this PDP and probably doesn't want it
to happen. It is ICANN management that is seizing on this
incident to expand its powers. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2