>Adam copied Karl Auerbach on his message.


I forwarded Karl's message (his entire message) to the list yesterday
<http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0408&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&F=&S=&P=4228>
and gave Karl the URL of the archives so he would understand the
context.

Someone had sent Karl a copy of my email commenting on his name being
suggested and I thought it unfair he was not seeing the context.  He
replied to that email (I will forward separately.)

Not sure why Milton missed the first few lines Karl's email, but for
completeness here they are again:

At 7:09 PM -0700 8/20/04, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>>I appreciate your willingness to bluntly express
>>opinions about nominees.
>>
>>But I don't agree with your assessment of Karl at all.
>
>I'm only seeing a partial flow of these messages.  So I did not see
>any "assessment" and I not been informed of the nature and quality
>of the contents.
>
>As for people having opinions about me and what I did (and continue
>to do) regarding ICANN:
>
>I don't expect everyone to agree with me.

(from "don't expect ... ", Milton forwards.)

Thanks

Adam



>As a non-member he cannot reply directly to the list
>so I am forwarding....
>
>>>>  Karl Auerbach <[log in to unmask]> 8/20/2004 10:09:44 PM >>>
>I don't expect everyone to agree with me.  Many of my positions are
>very
>nuanced.  For example, I agree with the concept of commercial
>enterprise
>and do not consider those who push for commercial gain or advantage
>(within the limits of law) to be acting improperly.  Nor do I find
>anything wrong or undesirable about the general concept of "government"
>-
>government can be the kind of good thing described in the Preamble to
>the
>US Constitution.
>


(duplicate text deleted. A/)