thanks dan

it's a very important discussion..

what are the next steps?

karen

At 16:07 28/06/2007, Dan Krimm wrote:
>Hi Karen,
>
>I was at the meeting and can clarify.
>
>The point you have arrowed recognizes that ALAC is not restricted to GNSO
>(as is NCUC).  ALAC has a direct relationship with the Board, and the
>suggestion is that it maintain this relationship moving forward.
>
>The idea is to increase formal and informal relationships between NCUC and
>ALAC without necessarily changing the organizational location of either
>group in the ICANN overall structure.  ALAC remains an advisory committee,
>and NCUC remains part of the GNSO, within whatever stakeholder grouping
>arrangement that finally results from the org modification.
>
>Dan
>
>
> > hi milton
> >
> >>Here is the slide set I presented at the joint
> >>ALAC-NCUC meeting yesterday. It describes the
> >>basic approach to reforms that found favor among
> >>the assembled group. Comments and criticisms welcome.
> >>Izumi, Carlos, feel free to forward to ALAC lists
> >
> > thanks for this.. i'll forward to europe ALAC also..
> >
> > can you explain what this means (last slide)?
> >
> > ALAC and the GNSO and beyond…
> > - Retain separate role for At Large
> > - All-ICANN, not just domain names <=== ???
> >
> > Elect Board members?
> > - But…facilitate movement of interested  individuals and ALSs into GNSO
> > - Check box on ALS application regarding  their
> > desire to participate also in GNSO
> >
> > karen
> >