Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:24:36 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
>
> It is not a staff proposal.
> > Board resoluion 2008-12-11-02
Yes, but the Board members tell us that the staff drafted that proposal, threw it on the agenda as the last item of a long meeting, and that no one partucularly understood or debated its implications. The Board members explanation was intended to downgrade the importance of the resolution and to make me feel better, but in fact it did the opposite: it suggested that either staff has an agenda and/or that Board really doesn't know what it's passing half the time....
> I look forward to council discussion on this to determine the right
> course of action for resolving the issues contained in the Board's
> motion and for responding to the Board's motion. I expect that the
> NCUC council members will give a strong indication of the NCUC's
> preferences in this matter.
Yes, NCUC Council members please take note!
> As for my reelection; while I do very much appreciate the
> enthusiastic support of NCUC council members and their nomination for
> my first two terms, just as I very much appreciate having been
> nominated by members of the RrC for the most recent election, I try to
> do the job as openly and fairly as I can without moderating my views
right, of course that is the right attitude
--MM
|
|
|