NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:21:32 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I need some help here...

I have read Mexico City ICANN Board meeting resolution:

<http://icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-06mar09.htm#07>

7. Protection for Trademarks in New gTLDs

....
Therefore resolved (2009.03.06.06), that the Board requests the GNSO's
Intellectual Property Constituency in consultation with staff to
convene an Implementation Recommendation Team comprised of an
internationally diverse group of persons with knowledge, expertise,
and experience in the fields of trademark, consumer protection, or
competition law, and the interplay of trademarks and the domain name
system to develop and propose solutions to the overarching issue of
trademark protection in connection with the introduction of new gTLDs.
....

That the IRT group apparently own-up to contradicting on "An Open
Letter from the IRT Introducing our Work (To be read before reading
our report)" at
<http://icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/irt-final-report-trademark-protection-29may09-en.pdf>

"....The views of the IRT reflect the views of business and trademark
interests in general..."

------
Question: Is the IRT report in the first place valid if it was
prepared by a group other than as directed by the ICANN Board
resolution 2009.03.06.06 ?

Could someone please help me understand,

Alex

ATOM RSS1 RSS2