That is very true - because we have been so very good at stopping the expansion of trademarks outside our circles now we will have to do the same within our own one. It is embarrassing for a constituency that calls itself non-commercial to promote the ICANN-led protection of trademarks and seek to justify it.
KK
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Law Lecturer,
Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
Website: http://domainnamelaw.ning.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kimberley Heitman
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [council] FYI - New GNSO Constituency Notice of Intent - Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency
> I do not understand very well. Why option to form a nonprofit group? Are
> we not in a dynamic representation of various social classes?
Have you noticed the proponents all have an interest in trademarks? A cynic
might think that it is an attempted takeover of the public interest
constituency by trademark owners, launched from the home of astro-turfing.
-----------------------
Kimberley James Heitman
www.kheitman.com
-----------------------
