NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ángel Sánchez Seoane <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ángel Sánchez Seoane <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:21:09 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
+1

2010/10/22 Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>:
> I support this statement's endorsement by the NCSG.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> The ALAC statement is perfect as far as I am concerned - it could have
>> been written by us.
>> Do let's endorse it
>> --MM
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Avri Doria [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 5:00 PM
>> > To: NCSG-Policy; NCSG Members List
>> > Subject: [ncsg-policy] Statement on Rec6
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The ALAC is putting out a statement on the Rec6 recommendations.
>> >
>> > I don't see us doing one by tomorrow.
>> >
>> > How about we endorse their statement?
>> >
>> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/gTLD+WG+-
>> > +ALAC+Draft+Statement+on+Rec+6+CWG+Report
>> >
>> > any objections?
>> >
>> > a.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2