Milton,

I'm not the one seeking to wrap up the WHOIS TF effort
with incomplete and deficient proposals still on the
table.  As I was one of the few that took the time to
submit a written proposal to the TF (the Natural
Persons Proposal), to characterize my remarks as
disingenuous is inappropriate.  

If you and other participants are too burnt out from
the process to seek to positively amend the OPoC
Proposal, I can understand... but the proposal as it
stands remains in need of work.


--- Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> >>> Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]> 3/5/2007
> 11:10 AM >>>
> >these three non-commercials are not the only ones
> that
> >had a problem with the OPOC proposal.  Patrick
> Vande
> 
> Danny, this is disingenuous. WHOIS is controversial.
> There is not now
> and never will be agreement on all details by all
> parties. If that is
> your standard for when the TF is finished it will
> never be finished. And
> of course,  as you know well, that outcome plays
> perfectly into the
> hands of people (such as you?) who want to retain
> the status quo, which
> allows them to plunder and data mine personal
> contact information in a
> completely unresitrcted manner. 
> 
> This is a clear demonstratoin of how the notion of
> "consensus" is
> completely inappropriate in any major policy issue,
> where there are
> difficult and controversial conflicts of interest
> among the parties. 
> 
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com