NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:41:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[council] GNSO Council resolutions 28 September 2006
Date: 	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:41:59 +0200
From: 	[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
To: 	[log in to unmask]


[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org]

Dear All,

Ahead of the GNSO Council minutes, Council passed the following motions
at its meeting on September 28, 2006.

1. The GNSO Council resolves:

a) To instruct the PDPFeb06 task force to continue its work, to appoint
an interim chair
b) To instruct staff to propose a work schedule in agreement with the
interim chair and Task Force this week and carry it out
c) To ask the General Counsel within 14 days to list all ICANN
agreements sections on consensus policy
d) To ask the General Counsel within 14 days to compare and contrast the 
PDP06 Terms of Reference with the so –called “picket fence” consensus 
policy areas and provide a  without prejudice assessment of likelihood 
of in or out of scope indicating uncertainty as necessary.

Passed by acclaim.

2. The GNSO Council resolves:

To request the Board to delay any decision on the .biz .info and .org
agreements until the ICANN Board meeting after the Sao Paolo ICANN 
meetings 2006 and to take into account the current outcome of the 
PDPFeb06 task force at that time.

Roll call vote. The motion passed. 11 votes in favour, 6 votes against, 
(Kiyoshi Tsuru  dropped off the call at the time of the vote)

3. The GNSO Council resolves:

To direct staff to begin information gathering, to conduct research and 
combine the background and historical information that would be 
necessary to review the policy development process and then make 
eventual changes to that process.

Passed by acclaim


Kind regards,

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2