NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:04:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I have revised the first paragraph of the NCUC response to incorporate
Iliya's comment as follows (see last sentence):

Impact on noncommercial users
The specific changes proposed for the .com contract will not have a
major impact on noncommercial users because most of us do not register
in .com. However, the method by which this decision was reached may have
lasting and major effects on the way ICANN operates. The effects
potentially go far beyond .com. Specifically, we see private bargaining
between ICANN staff and its contractors replacing the policy development
process of ICANN's constituencies. While we do not believe that every
change in registry contracts should be subject to collective oversight,
in this case we believe that ICANN staff has crossed the boundary
between contracting and policy making. We also see a dangerous conflict
between ICANN's putative oversight role and its incentive to negotiate
generous financial agreements with a contractor that is at the same time
ICANN's main source of revenue. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2