NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:17:26 +0100
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi,

I am also wondering if the Consumer Groups that are already members of the NCUC and the NCSG and who previously supported the idea of growth from within -  i.e. first join NCSG and then form Interest-groups/constituencies, have been consulted by those proposing this new Consumer Constituency using the Staff external procedures.

Also while waiting for the comment period to end and a Board decision, will those who want to form the CC, be willing to join the NCSG and work from within the stakeholder group.

a.

On 22 Jan 2010, at 11:01, William Drake wrote:

> Hi Rosemary,
> 
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:53 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Constituencies, I understand the Consumer one will be proposed - with Australian, France and Mexico Communications Consumer Organisations are part of the Constituency....
> 
> Sounds interesting. One question, as I'm at a meeting and cannot dig through the membership lists of these organizations at this time.  Can you confirm that these bodies are all comprised of noncommercial stakeholders (i.e. not businesses)?  If so great, if not it gets complicated...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2