I appreciate what the CIRA people are doing generally. But I do not
think that asking ICANN to hire a consultant to evaluate itself
constitutes a meaningful form of accountability. If ICANN selects and
pays the consultant, the consultant is not independent and is not in any
position to provide a truly independent assessment. It would be very
easy for ICANN to select service providers who were unlikely to rock the
boat. This is not a well thought out proposal.

>>> [log in to unmask] 6/15/2006 6:17 PM >>>
Fascinating... I did a similar proposal during the hot discussion times

of WSIS but of course CIRA has far more leverage. :) My proposal called

for an independent review working group, not a single consultant, but
it 
is welcome anyway.

--c.a.

Robert Guerra wrote:
> Thought this might be of interest to those on this list...
> 
> http://www.cira.ca/news-releases/177.html 
> 
> June 15, 2006
> CIRA's response to ICANN's letter dated March 23, 2006
> 
> Thank you for your letter dated March 23, 2006, and for taking the
time
> to meet with us on March 29, 2006 at the ICANN Meetings in
Wellington,
> New Zealand.
> 
> As discussed at our meeting, and to reiterate: ICANN is not losing
> CIRA's Voice. CIRA has no intention of disengaging from ICANN.
> 
> Rather, pending ICANN's resolution of the serious issues identified
in
> our open letter to ICANN dated March 17, 2006, related to
> accountability, transparency and fair processes, we have limited
CIRA's
> continued participation in ICANN. We do this to underscore the
gravity
> with which we view the issues raised and the urgent need for ICANN
to
> take positive and identifiable steps to remedy them.
> 
> The ICANN model of multi-stakeholder partnership in Internet
governance
> represents a bold experiment. It holds tremendous potential for the
> long-term, stable management of the Internet. The issues identified
by
> CIRA and the manner in which ICANN responds to them will bear
directly
> on the ultimate success or failure of this model.
> 
> Clearly there are numerous approaches that ICANN could take to
address
> the issues raised by CIRA. Choosing among these approaches is
entirely
> up to ICANN. Regardless of the particular approaches taken, ICANN
must
> demonstrate willingness to reform. Positive steps toward reform would
go
> a long way toward persuading CIRA that its ICANN participation should
be
> fully restored.
> 
> To that end, and to demonstrate our commitment to moving the process
> forward in a productive manner, we offer the following suggestion
for
> ICANN's consideration, which suggestion could be implemented without
delay:
> 
> CIRA recommends that ICANN engage a non-governmental, independent
> consultant to conduct a wide-reaching, public review of ICANN's
> transparency, accountability and the fairness of its processes and
to
> provide a road-map for ICANN's reform.
> 
> This review can be conducted in a manner similar to the review of
each
> Supporting Organization Council, each Advisory Committee (other than
the
> Governmental Advisory Committee), and the Nominating Committee as
set
> out in Article IV, Section 4 of ICANN's Bylaws.
> 
> CIRA puts forward this suggestion hoping that ICANN accepts it in
the
> constructive and positive spirit intended. We remain optimistic that
> ICANN will emerge from any reform process stronger and better for it.
We
> continue to offer any assistance we can to ICANN and to the ICANN
> Community in this regard.
> 
> Yours very truly,
> 
> Canadian Internet Registration Authority
> 
> 
> 
> Clyde Beattie
> Board of Directors, Chair 	
> 
> Bernard Turcotte
> President and Chief Executive Officer
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      [log in to unmask] 
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      [log in to unmask] 
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance 
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     [log in to unmask] 
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     [log in to unmask] 

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance