Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:13:03 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear all,
Milton has requested that I share a clarification of
my views with the list; I am happy to do so.
Milton,
I have no issues with Ross's proposal. By the same
token, I do not believe that it (no standardized
policy) represents the best way forward. I recall the
face-to-face multi-day policy session that we had on
the topic of new gTLDs in Washington where you and
Mawaki and I participated. What emerged was a lowest
common denominator understanding (not exactly
consensus, but reasonably close) that guided a path
forward.
I see the value in face-to-face discussions and
recognize the fact that other proposals heretofore
submitted had been given short shrift by members of
Jordyn Buchanan's WHOIS TF. I am not prepared to give
up either on these proposals or on the concept of the
value of ongoing multi-stakeholder dialogue on this
topic.
I would rather see the NCUC put forward a motion
calling for intersessional multi-party discussions on
WHOIS. Less in-your-face, and more face-to-face.
regards,
Danny Younger
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
|
|
|