NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:07:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
Alan:
Your disagreement is noted and of course accepted, but I am having trouble understanding your point about the domain below. Some clarification may be required.

Whatever happened to this domain, happened under the existing Whois policy and the existing registrar accreditation contact, right? 

So what exactly is the point you are making about Whois policy? 

Remember, the issue we are dealing with now is NOT "what's your opinion of Whois generally?"

It IS: do you agree or disagree with the resolution (proposed by Ross Rader of the registrar constituency) which recognizes that there is no consensus on the Whois privacy tradeoff now and calls for the existing contractual conditions to expire until a consensus policy is negotiated.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Levin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 2:35 AM
> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Urgent: your response needed
> 
> 
> On 16 Sep 2007, at 8:07 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> > I am asking ALL NCUC members to express their opinion on this by
> > replying to this email. Just check one of the two boxes. Add
> > comments if you have any.
> >
> > /X/ DISAGREE
> I believe that:
> - the current system is working,
> - can be compliant  be compliant with the laws of the 15 nations
> - and enables a more competitive registrar and reseller industry
> e.g. I recently learned from an ISOC member that they inadvertently
> cancelled their domain (instead of accepting a registrar transfer
> request) and within hours the whois transcript for the domain looked
> like this:
> 
> Server used for this query: [ whois.enom2.com ]
> 
> =-=-=-=
> 
> Domain name: revealbeautybar.com
> 
> Administrative Contact:
>     Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
>     Whois Agent ([log in to unmask])
>     +1.4252740657
>     Fax: +1.4256960234
>     PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
>     C/O revealbeautybar.com
>     Bellevue, WA 98007
>     US
> 
> Technical Contact:
>     Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
>     Whois Agent ([log in to unmask])
>     +1.4252740657
>     Fax: +1.4256960234
>     PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
>     C/O revealbeautybar.com
>     Bellevue, WA 98007
>     US
> 
> Registrant Contact:
>     Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
>     Whois Agent ([log in to unmask])
>     +1.4252740657
>     Fax: +1.4256960234
>     PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
>     C/O revealbeautybar.com
>     Bellevue, WA 98007
>     US
> 
> Status: Locked
> 
> Name Servers:
>     dns1.name-services.com
>     dns2.name-services.com
>     dns3.name-services.com
>     dns4.name-services.com
>     dns5.name-services.com
> 
> Creation date: 13 Sep 2007 13:24:00
> Expiration date: 11 Sep 2008 06:27:00
> =-=-=-=
> 
> Version 6.3 4/3/2002
> 
> 
> 
> hth
> 
> aL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Alan Levin - Chairman
> Internet Society of South Africa
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date:
> 9/18/2007 11:53 AM
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: 9/18/2007 11:53 AM
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2