Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:35:50 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I support the nominations, too.
Erick
At 07:50 a.m. 31/10/2003 -0400, Ermanno Pietrosemoli wrote:
>I suppport these nominations
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:24 PM
>Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WHOIS taskforce nominations
>
>
> > I agree.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > At 1:43 PM -0500 10/30/03, Milton Mueller wrote:
> > >Under our new charter, our new Council representatives,
> > >as Chairs of the Policy Committee, should initiate the process
> > >of assigning NCUC members to Council Task Forces.
> > >
> > >Since our election will take place during this crucial 10
> > >day period, I think we have to act now, using the old Council
> > >and Adcom members (me, Chun, and possibly Gabriel).
> > >
> > >So I would put forward the following nominations for
> > >the three task forces:
> > >
> > >Task Force 1: Data Mining
> > >Milton Mueller
> > >
> > >Task Force 2: Data Collection and Privacy
> > >Kathy Kleiman
> > >
> > >Task Force 3: Data Accuracy
> > >Fran Wellings, EPIC
> > >
> > >Reason for these nominations:
> > >The Task Force 1 will move very fast. Since I was on the
> > >Whois Steering Committee I will be up to speed and
> > >ready to go. Task Force 2 is the most important one.
> > >Kathy Kleiman has been working on that since the
> > >decision to send her to Tunisia, so I hope she is
> > >willing to continue. Task Force 3 involves issues
> > >that EPIC has expertise in.
> >
> >
> > --
|
|
|