Thanks for your thoughts, McTim. Indeed, a GAC statement would be
fundamental. You are right, the servers are outside of the country, but
the government could go really far if ICANN does not take a stand. I am
mostly worried about RDS-HN itself -- its work goes well beyond managing
the .hn domain, and they are in an extremely vulnerable situation.

[] fraterno

--c.a.

McTim wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Dear people,
>>
>>
> <SNIP>
> 
>> It is obvious a clear and urgent position from ICANN against this
>> arbitrary seizure is needed.
>>
>>
> That would be useful indeed.
> 
> Even better if the GAC were to issue a statement condemning this attempted
> seizure.
> 
> This is interesting timing coming the day before the end of the JPA.
> 
> In any case, as you can see here:
> http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/hn.html  the DNS servers aren't under
> the control of the honduran gov't, so they clearly haven't thought this
> through.
> 
> Does this mean that all Local Internet Registries (ISPs with IP address
> allocations from LACNIC) will also be seized?
> 
> it's a disturbing development indeed!
> 
> 

-- 

Carlos A. Afonso
CGI.br (www.cgi.br)
Nupef (www.nupef.org.br)
====================================
new/nuevo/novo e-mail: [log in to unmask]
====================================