Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:57:35 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If you go straight with the triple X theme Rod will get out of the bag
the politically correct answer, I guess we have to be more clever and
ask if he supports the independent review process and how he thinks
the board has to act given that as far as I know the review process is
not binding.
My .02
Jorge
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Konstantinos has provided a better way of asking the question I was trying to ask with my second question.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> David, I would also add to any questions on the new gTLDs, whether he
>> believes that the trademark protection issue can now be considered
>> resolved after the work of the STI. Whether after the last public
>> comment period and the acceptance of the STI's work, trademark
>> protection is no longer an issue nor will it be resuscitated in the
>> future.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC-
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>>
>> You could also ask whether he thinks it's a good idea to allow powerful
>> interest groups keep trying to re-write the policies governing the new
>> gTLD introduction.
>>
>
|
|
|