 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" |
| Date: |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:23:25 +0000 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree. I was asking for clarification because if he means Microsoft his statement doesn't make much sense. I've been having a hard time following his logic. It's starting to sound like a typical anti-Microsoft rant. If that's the case I'll quit trying to find the logic.
Kerry Brown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicolas Adam
Sent: August-22-12 1:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] The DNS problem
I'm pretty sure it refers to microsoft but ¯ and I don't usually display an over-exuberance of love for ms ¯ I fail to see how it [sic] has the major influence in the DNS system.
Nicolas
On 22/08/2012 4:04 PM, Kerry Brown wrote:
I'm not sure who or what you mean by "MS"?
Kerry Brown
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Carl Smith
Sent: August-22-12 12:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] The DNS problem
Thanks McTim,
However, DNS is an IP look up system and re-director, where LISP is a programing language. MS has the major influence in the DNS system. We need a less single source dominated system. Our hope must come from the Open Source mavericks to provide the way.
Lou
On 8/21/2012 11:29 AM, McTim wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations imposed during the infancy of development stages of machine inter-connectivity. Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each machine a unique identity. The limited IP addresses are licensed to master networks which in turn are sub-netted to machines which only have a local identity slaved to the master.
Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not slaved or controlled by a master.
Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem?
If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
|
|
|
