I agree. The more new gTLDs are delayed the more chances are for additions and/or amendments. I would suggest the process to go forward and we keep a close eye on the various issues, MAPO, URS, TMC, WHOIS, etc. we will need a minimum of monitoring.
KK
On 06/12/2010 22:06, "Robin Gross" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Yes, this is the best option - a short statement supporting the key points in the ALAC comment that we agree on - which is nearly all - & just add that we want gtlds to go forward soon.
Thanks,
Robin
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could produce a short support statement that says we support the points, but that we do not accept further delay of the program and suggest that issues re remedied within the next 60 days.
>
> or something similar.
>
> a.
>
> On 6 Dec 2010, at 16:41, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>
>> I'm sure I have problems with some of the nits, including some of those
>> identified by ALAC. I have more of a problem with continual delay, and
>> with the worse problems others would introduce if we "solve" these problems.
>>
>> --Wendy
>>
>> On 12/06/2010 04:34 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> I find myself in complete agreement with the ALAC statement on the crucial issues of the DRSP, the Independent Objector and the illegitimate role of the staff in setting policy. I cannot fathom why Wendy would want to approve the AG without modifications. Can you explain?
>>> --MM
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>>>> Wendy Seltzer
>>>> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:36 PM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: ALAC comment on the Proposed
>>>> Applicant Guidebook
>>>>
>>>> I would not endorse the conclusion of this statmeent.
>>>>
>>>> In particular, I personally disagree with the statement that "we must
>>>> regretfully but categorically state that we consider the current PAG to
>>>> be unacceptable as presented, and against the best interest of Internet
>>>> end-users." I would urge the approval of the AG now.
>>>>
>>>> --Wendy
>>>>
>>>> On 12/06/2010 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Evan has asked the NCCG/NCUC to consider endorsing the ALAC statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> They expect to vote on it tomorrow, and Evan has indicated willingness
>>>> to come in and speak to us.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draf
>>>> t+Final+Applicant+Guidebook
>>>>>
>>>>> a.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
>>>> Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
>>>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>>>> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
>>>> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
>>>> https://www.torproject.org/donate << please donate!
>>>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
>> Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
>> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
>> https://www.torproject.org/donate << please donate!
>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask]
|
