 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed |
| Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:21:23 +0200 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
<p06240801cc2dc23f20d1@[192.168.1.31]> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What about defining first what legally is a domain name?
jfc
PS. I am preparing a draft on the convergence's digital name syntax.
Anyone interested in co-authoring it ?
>At 11:23 AM -0400 7/18/12, Avri Doria wrote:
>>Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>>From: Brian Peck <<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
>>>
>>>Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red
>>>Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
>>>
>>>Date: 18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
>>>
>>>To: "<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]"
>>><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
>>>
>>>
>>>List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
>>>In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please
>>>find below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed
>>>to date for moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to
>>>protect the RCRC and IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:
>>>
>>>1. Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special
>>>protections for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the
>>>current schedule of second-level reserved names in the new gTLD
>>>Registry Agreement).
>>>2. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such
>>>as extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all
>>>or a subset of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organizationıs names.
>>>3. Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections
>>>now and wait to see if any additional protections may be necessary
>>>after the delegation of the first round new gTLD strings and/or
>>>consider lowering costs for each organization to utilize RPMs (
>>>i.e., Thomas Rickertıs proposal)
>>>4. Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC
>>>as part of a broader PDP on the protection of names for
>>>international organizations
>>>5. Ask ICANN General Counselıs office to conduct a legal
>>>analysis to substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of
>>>treaty law and/or statutes that would require registries and
>>>registrars to protect IOC and RCRC names by law.
>>>
>>>
>>>Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything
>>>further at this time. Thanks.
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>
>>>Brian
>>>
>>>Brian Peck
>>>Policy Director
>>>ICANN
|
|
|
