NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:08:51 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
At 2:39 PM +0200 4/24/04, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, at 18:58 [=GMT-0400], Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>>  Our previous rep, Marc Schneiders, might be in a good position
>>  to explain to all what is involved. Marc?
>
>Last year there were more positions to be filled (8, now, I think just
>3) and since it was the first time the rules/processes had to be
>invented. This meant it took a lot of time. I am unable to give a
>precise number of hours. A guess: 200.


That the first nomcom setup many of the rules and processes should
mean less work this time around.  I haven't found a list of posts to
be filled this year, perhaps 3 board seats, 2 ALAC, 1 GNSO council,
and 3 for the ccNSO council. And I think none for the NRO council as
yet?

Milton, could you ask what posts are to be filled.

Thanks,

Adam





>How much time it takes this year, will depend on the number of
>applications. As a member of the NomCom you obviously have to read the
>applications. The research into the backgrounds of the applicants was
>last year done by subgroups of the NomCom.
>
>Meetings were last year by weekly teleconferences and in person for
>two days in Boston.
>
>I do not regret that I participated, not at all. It is a lonely job
>though, as all has to be done confidentialy. You cannot ask advise to
>outsiders, let alone discuss things on a mailing list.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2