NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:41:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
(note: adding the full discuss list, which I forgot to do in the first instance)

PS.  I updated the table:

https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers

and there are lots of opportunties for people to volunteer.

On 2 Sep 2010, at 10:05, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am sitting in the PDP work team meeting and was asked whether we intend to submit a review to the new PDP processes.
> 
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report
> 
> Is anyone willing?  The deadline has been moved for one last extension to Sept 30.  
> 
> BTW: I am on the WT and thus even if I wanted to comment, i don't believe I should be the one to do so. i tend to believe that those in a group have enough opportunity to make their points and comments should be generated by others.  I think this stuff is important to NCSG since that is how all of the policy gets made and these changes may have an effect on how we work.
> 
> a.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2