Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:13:19 +0900 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Jorge,
At 6:43 AM -0500 11/4/10, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>Dear Amber,
>
>please, can you add to the list an answer explaining as a
>representative of AAMC
>how much experience and participation did you have in ICANN and its policy
>development processes and what is the actual role of the Intellectual property
>administration and protection office at AAMC ?
Why is this relevant?
Constituency we're interested in, not the person, surely.
Adam
>Thanks & Regards
>Jorge
>
>On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Amber Sterling <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your questions and interest in the proposed NPOC. At last
>> count we had a dozen detailed questions. We are working on a Q&A document
>> (after a long work day) that addresses each of these questions in turn. Our
>> hope is that the single document will provide a better insight into the NPOC
>> than answering the questions piecemeal. As many of the questions require
>> detailed and thoughtful responses in order to be meaningful we greatly
>> appreciate your patience as we develop this document.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Amber
>>
>>
>>
>> Amber Sterling
>>
>> Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
>>
>> Association of American Medical Colleges
|
|
|