dear folks, dwi and friends:
interesting discussions on xxx domain... by the way i am also from
indonesia...but from NGO... association of internet cafe...
probably sex is view very differently in Indonesia and in global
governance community...
in indonesia anything to do with sex... just to say sex is almost
taboo... not halal... so that the government launch a program internet
sehat and filter all sex content... and this week asked BB (blackberry)
to install also filter in its server in RIM (Canada) from Indonesian BB
users...
Actually for us as private sector... this is not an easy task... and
probably wont be successful... but it is a nice try to prevent
pornography...
on the otherhand pornography is also exist in many places in Indonesia..
such as SPA, massage parlour... and prostitute site... but the
government seems to close their attentions...
anyway... back to xxx domain...
according to my view... as part of Indonesian civil association... this
is an attempt to localized the sex domain... the same thing as we
localize prostitutions... so should be OK... and probably make live
easier for filtering content (kids access to internet).
whether the site will be used for negative used... child abuse and so
on... this is another issue that will be tackle by existing (global)
cyberlaw... Indonesia also has now cyberlaw (we called it UU ITE Law no
11/2009 :-) ...that lacks of PP ( or supporting law to implement the
cyberlaw...
nice discussions and very good input for the global internet
governance... regards, rudi rusdiah - apwkomitel ( association of
community internet center - jakarta, indonesia).
On 01/12/2011 08:04 PM, Dwi Elfrida Martina S wrote:
> Hi andrew..
>
> I am new member of NCSG but not new member in ICANN. I have been 2 years
> involve within ICANN and exist in GAC meeting from the fist time GAC start
> to Draft MOPO. I was replace DG of ICT and Director of e-government of
> Ministry of ICT of Indonesia who are representative in GAC.indeed, I am
> fellowship of ICANN. So please.. watching your words!
>
> As I know, from beginning .XXX is site that intended for sex. .xxx is
> inspire from .xxx.com that known as site for sex activities. But as they
> propose counter to court of USA and make openness and freedom become their
> justification, so the court ask ICANN to review their .xxx proposal. But,
> if you have new issue that .XXX is not site for sex, you have to announce
> that thing to all participant in ICANN meeting, because as I know, from
> Cartagena meeting, most of participant still have the same point of view
> with me.
>
> Beside,my question to you, can you guarantee that the content of .XXX is
> not site for sex? what kind of and openness and freedom that they asked
> for? what is the proof that .XXX as TLD is nothing to do with .XXX.COM?
> Yes.. I you are not Policy maker in NCSG, so please don't make any
> conclusion before its not an agreement between members.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Dwi
>
>
>
>
> Dwi,
>
>> Before posting on any topic, I suggest you familiarise yourself with the
>> current issues by reading through the mailing list archives. There you
>> will
>> find that the creation of .xxx is settled NCSG policy and the reasoning
>> behind it has nothing to do with sex and everything to do with openness,
>> freedom and the following of existing rules rather than exactly the kind
>> of
>> knee-jerk blinkered moralism that the MAPO proposals represent.
>>
>> I do not make NCSG policy, but I'm well aware of it, and of the reasons
>> for
>> it.
>>
>> The MAPO issue has also been well-discussed by the existing membership.
>> While
>> I welcome new members, I do not welcome them making personal attacks on
>> the
>> basis of not understanding anything about the existing situation when they
>> join.
>>
>> --
>> Professor Andrew A Adams [log in to unmask]
>> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and
>> Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
>> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan http://www.a-cubed.info/
>>
>>
>
>
|
