Andrew:
There is no "power" that comes by forming a constituency. The old linkage between Council seats and constituencies is gone (thank God).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Andrew A. Adams
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:29 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] The Purpose of Constituencies?
> 
> Milton and Jolie,
> 
> Thanks for the information.
> 
> I'm still conflicted on whether an academic constituency would be
> worthwhile.
> If it is needed to help balance the power distribution in NCSG because
> of the way ICANN/GNSO views NCSG then it's a necessary evil, given that
> we had the formal constituency model imposed upon us by the Board
> (that's my reading of the charter process anyway - that NCSG had a
> majority opposed to constituencies and that we weakened the Board's
> requirements for giving power to constituencies but couldn't manage to
> avoid them having some significant effect). We should think carefully as
> to whether and how to work it. I think most of the academics here would
> be willing to work to only exert any power that came with a constituency
> in such a way as to counterbalance other unrepresentative power blocs
> rather than to try to exert our own power. While the academics might
> have other personal interests, of course, most of us I think are here
> because we have an interest in trying to make ICANN fairer and better
> run. On balance, therefore, with some careful drafting of a charter I
> might be willing to support an academic constituency.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and Deputy
> Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/