Hi,

As Milton is not currently the chair or in an official role for NCUC  
(I don't think), I am not sure why NCUC needs to repudiate him.

I am sure we all don't agree with what any of us writes and am not  
sure that we need to write a repudiation every time someone says  
something the NCUC doesn't agree with.  I would not expect the NCUC  
was reading everything I wrote in my blog and deciding whether they  
agreed with me or not or whether they needed to publicly rebuke me.

Not making any personal comment on the content of this yet, since I  
have not done the research.

I would also be surprised and disappointed if anyone were to take his  
personal words and his personal blog , whatever their characteristics,  
as a cause for action against the NCUC.

a.

On 23 Sep 2009, at 05:10, Adam Peake wrote:

> At 5:58 PM -0400 9/22/09, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/9/22/4329523.html
>
>
> I hope the NCUC will make clear it does not support Milton's  
> inaccurate, personally vindictive blog.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
> (member of ALAC and NCUC. Opinions are my own.)