NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:46:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
While i believe I would agree with the spirit of ALAC's statement.

Nicolas

On 12/6/2010 1:36 PM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> I would not endorse the conclusion of this statmeent.
>
> In particular, I personally disagree with the statement that "we must
> regretfully but categorically state that we consider the current PAG to
> be unacceptable as presented, and against the best interest of Internet
> end-users."  I would urge the approval of the AG now.
>
> --Wendy
>
> On 12/06/2010 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Evan has asked the NCCG/NCUC to consider endorsing the ALAC statement.
>>
>> They expect to vote on it tomorrow, and Evan has indicated willingness to come in and speak to us.
>>
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draft+Final+Applicant+Guidebook
>> a.
>>
>>
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2