Hi,

Sorry about the entry, that is what I received from NCUC.  You were not sent a ballot, because you had not checked in.  and while I understand you did not receive the individual email, there were also notifications on the list.

Well as awkward as it sounds for such sponsors of NCUC activities as yourselves I guess the new organization, Nupef, would need to be admitted as a member of the NCSG.  Unless of course this was already taken care of in the past within NCUC before the new charter was passed by the Board. either Robin the previous chair of NCUC or Konstantinos, the current chair of NCUC would need to give an indication of this having happened.

Assuming that NCUC did not already admit Nupef, Nupef would need to send email the [log in to unmask] indicating the basis on which it was qualified for membership based on the condition listed in the charter.

a.

On 15 Aug 2011, at 13:08, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:

> Hi Avri, I notice I am shown in the list (*) as representing Rits, which
> is no longer active (stopped its activities more than two years ago) --
> the organization I represent is Instituto Nupef.
> 
> As my old Rits email is no longer used (although it is not yet dead),
> the ballot might have been sent to that old address. How to fix this?
> 
> frt rgds
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> (*) https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Active+Members
> 
> 
> On 08/15/2011 05:43 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> At the last check, among those on the active member list who were sent ballots
>> 
>> 
>> -  the reps of 7 large organizations have not yet voted on the charter  - 28 votes
>> 
>> -  the reps of 10 small organizations have not yet voted on the charter - 20 votes
>> 
>> -  23 individuals have not yet voted on the charter - 23 votes
>> 
>> That's 71 missing votes.
>> 
>> That is 71 votes effectively against the new charter
>> 
>> That is a 45% vote against the charter.  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> a.
>