Well, Danny, it points to the suggestion we have been discussing (and I 
have been insisting on from time to time) of having a single non-profit 
civil society caucus within ICANN, replacing (or subsuming, or 
encompassing, or synthesizing...) what are now NCUC and ALAC. To my 
knowledge, NCUC is far more sympathetic to the idea than ALAC.

frt rgds

--c.a.

Danny Younger wrote:
>>From the LSE Report:
> 
> 4.35 In tandem with Recommendation 5 above that
> individuals' and organizations' primary membership
> should be of ICANN as a whole rather than of specific
> constituencies, we suggest creating a simpler
> Constituency structure with only three main divisions:
> 
> -- Registration, including the current Registries and
> Registrars Constituencies;
> -- Business Users, including the current Business,
> Intellectual Property and ISP Constituencies; and
> -- Civil Society, including the current NCUC, but also
> ordinary domain holders, and possibly individuals
> currently represented via the At Large Advisory
> Committee of ICANN.
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> Do NCUC members support this recommendation?  
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 

-- 

Carlos A. Afonso
diretor de planejamento
Rits - Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor
***************************************************************
Projeto Sacix - Apoio técnico a iniciativas de inclusão digital
com software livre, mantido pela Rits em colaboração com o
Coletivo Digital. Para mais informações:
www.sacix.org.br   www.rits.org.br   www.coletivodigital.org.br
***************************************************************