NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mawaki Chango <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:28:15 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mawaki Chango <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Folks,

During the GNSO Council public meeting and the Board's public forum,
it was mentioned that the Constituencies need to advise the Board
and/or post their input/reaction to the LSE Report. The time line
often suggested was within 2 weeks after Sao Paulo meeting. I
remember a while ago there was a lot of discussion of the report on
this list. So please, if you'd like to put your (existing) written
thoughts or heads together and advise the Board and the GNSO Council,
this is the time.

Robin and Norbert, please advise if I didn't get this information
right. Particularly, I'm not quite clear if this was a decision
agreed upon by the Council and just a suggested item discussion
without any decision. Anyway, it's at least strongly suggested and I
heard a couple of Board members making mention of this, too.

Mawaki


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2