Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) |
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_3CFC64D9-8D4F-4648-81BE-EBA467B2E5A1";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Nov 2013 05:39:14 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
So the problem with the UIS+UK is their competence?
What is scaling up international reactions is hypocrisy.
And perhaps a bit of jealousy at not being as competent.
avri
On 6 Nov 2013, at 03:56, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
> Obviously every state keeps an intelligence service. The major difference between the duo USA+UK and the rest is the scale, persistence and pervasiveness of surveillance -- something orders of magnitude beyond what any other country does.
>
> This is what is motivating the scaling up of international reactions.
>
> --c.a.
>
> On 11/06/2013 09:41 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
>> And this
>>
>> "GCHQ and European spy agencies worked together on mass surveillance"
>>
>> <http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/nov/01/gchq-europe-spy-agencies-mass-surveillance-snowden>
>>
>> Brazil's surveillance -- isn't this the kind of spying we'd expect, as featured in almost every spy novel? Also looks like the US might be leaking back, making itself look not quite so bad.
>>
>> Discussion at the IGF I think made pretty clear that it wasn't the act of surveillance that was a shock, spies spy, but the scale, the absolutely massive (massive) scale, that everyone was a target (or potentially so), that US administration had been clear they didn't care about rights of non-US citizens: this might not have come through as clearly in the sessions as it might, but that human rights were violated was emphasized over and over.
>>
>> Couple of sessions at the IGF discussed: the final morning "Main Session: Emerging Issues – Internet Surveillance" <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf-2013-transcripts/1439-taking-stock-emerging-issues--internet-surveillance>. And somewhat on the morning of the first day "Building Bridges – The Role of Governments in Multistakeholder Cooperation" <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf-2013-transcripts/1447-building-bridges-the-role-of-governments-in-multistakeholder-cooperation> (links are to full transcript)
>>
>> And there's a chairs summary on the IGF website that attempts to summarize things (clumsy stuff, and I was one of the pair who wrote it, a new version will be added later today).
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I guess the summit in Rio will include a discussion about this no ?
>>>
>>> http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/5/5068024/brazil-admits-to-spying-on-us-russia-iran-diplomatic-targets-after-nsa-criticism
>>>
>>> -J
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|