NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 05:29:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
A well-done summary of the situation, Adam. You are one smart guy.
No, to be less cynical, I presume that the constituency will "request"
that the changes be made and the LSE group will decide whether to make
the requested changes. The issue is whether that decision comes after a
few beatings and trips to Guantanamo.

>>> Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> 9/2/2006 4:08 AM >>>
So.  Let's say I think a particular constituency is completely 
useless: captured, undemocratic, not transparent ...  basically a 
sham of what a constituency should be.  I've responded to the LSE 
survey, sent comments, etc.  Tried to provide good clear criticism.

Now my comments, and perhaps many many similar comments, will be 
"corrected" by a single person from that constituency?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2