Milton,
Thank you for the input and the pointers to
established constituency positions. I will begin the
re-write.
Best wishes,
Danny
--- Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Danny:
> I'm impressed by your energy but very disappointed
> by your decision to
> completely alter established NCUC positions.
>
> The constituency has over the course of the last 6
> months staked out a
> clear and consensual position on the renewal issue.
> You have completely
> abandoned that, despite no indications of support
> from others in the
> constituency, and come up with an entirely new and
> different position.
> The position is very complicated, based on ccTLD
> procedures, and takes
> the registrar constituency position on rebids.
>
> That's not the way things can be done here. Please
> refer to the
> existing NCUC statement on renewal expectancy,
>
http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0604&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&O=D&X=6285946F42781A231F&Y=mueller%40syr.edu&P=6368
>
>
> and also to the notes of the NCUC meeting in
> Marrakech, drafted by
> Carlos.
>
http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0606&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&O=D&X=1988C02DA913349905&Y=mueller%40syr.edu&P=8740
>
>
> Any position must use these discussions and drafts
> as a starting point.
>
>
> The Marrakech meeting discussed these positions
> extensively. That was
> in fact the largest real-time grouping of
> constituency members in some
> time. It is unacceptable to trash that work.
>
> Please do not submit this report to the Rapporteur
> group, or to anyone
> else, otherwise the constituency will have to
> disavow it and that will
> make us all look ridiculous, and undermine your
> credibility in the
> process.
>
> I have only read the renewal part. Since that was
> completely orthogonal
> to what we have discussed and written so far, I fear
> going any further.
> As time permits, I'll read the rest of it but can't
> say that I am
> looking forward to it.
>
> Really, Danny, show some respect for the fact that
> this is a
> CONSTITUENCY that needs to develop positions as a
> group.
>
>
> >>> Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
> 10/17/2006 8:24 AM >>>
> Dear all,
>
> A formal NCUC Statement has been prepared covering
> the
> following topics:
>
> 1) gTLD renewal policy
> 2) policy for gtld Consensus Policy limitations
> 3) gTLD price control policy
> 4) policy for ICANN fees pertaining to gTLDs
> 5) policy on the use of gTLD registry data
> 6) gTLD development/infrastructure investment
> policy
>
> This statement is attached as a twenty (20) page
> Word
> document. The statement has already been forwarded
> to
> the NCUC Policy Committee for review and now awaits
> your constituency member comments, suggested
> modifications, and/or partial or complete revisions.
>
> Per the timetable established by Rapporteur Groups A
> &
> B, our final work-product must be submitted by 24
> October in order to be included in the Final Report
> submitted to the GNSO PDP Task Force on Contractual
> Conditions for Existing Registries.
>
> As the views of our constituency will not
> necessarily
> coincide with those expressed by other
> constituencies,
> it is important that a cogent Minority Report makes
> its way to the ICANN Board via the GNSO's Final
> Report.
>
> Each paragraph has been numbered for ease of
> discussion, and all member comments will be
> referenced
> in the final version of this document.
>
> I look forward to your assistance in properly
> presenting the NCUC view on these matters.
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Danny Younger
> isoc-ny
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
