NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:07:30 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
At 7:48 AM +0100 6/8/09, Rebecca MacKinnon wrote:
>It's highly unfortunate and disappointing.
>
>Nonetheless, should we encourage NCUC community members to step up for
>this, particularly members who come from countries in the developing
>world and/or from countries which do not have free and fair elections,
>and thus whose governments (and by extension GAC representatives)
>arguably do not represent citizens' interests?
>
>The alternative it seems is that it would be filled with people
>currently unknown to the NCUC community.
>
>They want diversity, we show them we have it?

	In my opinion, we should nominate as many people as we can, 
from as many different groups as we can (certainly including, but not 
limited to, members from the developing world, and from countries 
whose GAC representatives may not represent them well).
	We have basically no idea what criteria the SIC will be using 
to select candidates, and it is in our interest to nominate people 
that cover as many bases as possible. We should be putting up people 
from a range of backgrounds, from a range of countries, to maximise 
our chances that these seats will go to someone sympathetic to NCUC.
	Cheers
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2