Robert,

Rigging an election by removing qualified candidates
and then introducing your own candidate into the mix
without anyone on the NARALO discussion list being
made aware of that candidacy is not a stellar
demonstration of "process"; your actions demonstrate
an abuse of authority and a callous disregard for the
views and concerns of the NARALO membership -- and
yes, your integrity is at issue.

Integrity means adherence to ethical principles. 
Denying a qualified candidate the opportunity to be
voted upon is unethical and is unfair to the
candidate.  

--- Robert Guerra <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Danny ,
> 
> Your tone, comments, choice of words and personal
> nature of your  
> attacks are well abusive and not constructive in the
> least.
> 
> WHO did i consult with - well, people in at large as
> well experts  
> that I know who know ICANN well. Wendy and Bret
> being one of many  
> persons I consulted about the nomcom candidates.
> Their comments were  
> very helpful. I will not say more.
> 
> please - represent my words well.... I did not state
> who i consulted  
> with. In fact, I did NOT at any time consult with
> ICANN staff nor any  
> of its representatives. To say so, i see as a
> personal attack on my  
> integrity.
> 
> I do not appreciate personal attacks - and prefer to
> focus my limited  
> time on more respectful discussion, one that leads
> to constructive   
> change. I have explained the process , stated my
> views and leave it  
> at that.
> 
> regards
> 
> Robert
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469