LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: motion on Chatham
From:	David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:49:54 +0800
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (13 lines)

At 5:09 PM -0800 27/1/10, Robin Gross wrote:
>I'm not so keen on the amendment re: Chatham House rule.   I don't 
>like the idea that the review teams can decide its a secret and its 
>a secret.  Its too easy and there is no limitation on what they can 
>decide is an exceptional circumstance.

	The Chatham house rule means that nothing that is said is 
secret, only who said it. If, in some peoples discomfort with the 
Chatham house rule, we end up giving review teams the option to use 
more restrictive rules, that would be a poor outcome.
	Cheers
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU