NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:23:46 +0200
Reply-To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Application For New GNSO Constituency in The NCSG -- PIA-CC
From:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
On Oct 11, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Adam Peake wrote:

> Shouldn't the ISP constituency be involved in this discussion?
> 
> From the application documents, looks like they are trying to create an association, rather than being an already established group.  
> 
I got the same impression.

> Perhaps as a member of NPOC rather than a new constituency?
> 
> Adam
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2