Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2006 01:57:36 +0900 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What time would you like George and me, would 11 am be OK?
Sorry, George's presentation of the NomCom was
bumped from this morning's public session, so you
won't be able to respond to that. But we'll
introduce what happened and take questions best
we can.
Thanks,
Adam
At 2:35 PM -0200 12/4/06, Carlos Afonso wrote:
>Dear people at the Icann meeting,
>
>We should start our meeting at 09:00 AM, room Brasília 2.
>
>fraternal regards
>
>--c.a.
>
>Mawaki Chango wrote:
>>Under point 5 I'd hope that we could make a few decisions on some
>>pending points in the ongoing PDP-Feb06 (contractual conditions of
>>the existing registry contracts). I'll try to sort out later on the
>>most urgent issues and post them for possible your comments.
>>
>>Mawaki
>>
>>--- Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks, Robin, for your quick suggestions. Below is the second
>>>draft.
>>>
>>>rgds
>>>
>>>--c.a.
>>>
>>>===
>>>Agenda (draft 2)
>>>
>>>1. Presentation of a list of persons presently serving in NCUC
>>>functions
>>>-- including terms of service (excom, finance, delegation to GNSO
>>>council, Working Groups/TFs, etc)
>>>
>>>2. Discussion of longer range NCUC personnel planning for outgoing
>>>assignments (I am one of them some time)
>>>
>>>3. Discussion about principled, targeted outreach to get some
>>>additional members into NCUC, including procedural/practical arrangements
>>>
>>>4. Funding to establish minimal operational conditions -- from
>>>Icann?
>>> From which other sources?
>>>
>>>5. Specific reports from TFs/Working Groups/GNSO Council reps.
>>>
>>>6. Elections (NCUC representation in ICANN fora)
>>>
>>>7. Specific cases to be resolved -- INTLNet (any other?)
>>>
>>>---
>>>
>>>
>>>Visitors to the NCUC meeting
>>>
>>>1. PIR -- ?
>>>2. NomCom -- Adam Peake and George Sadowsky
>>>3. MINC -- Subbiah
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
>>http://new.mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|