For a detailed analysis of NCUC's objection to the proposal, see:
http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCUC_Comments_on_New_gTLDs.pdf

Thanks,
Robin

NCUC continues to strongly object to the principles and recommendations 
in the GNSO New TLD Committee’s Draft Final Report on the Introduction 
of New Generic Top-Level Domains (14 Nov. 2006). In particular, the 
proposed selection criteria for strings and dispute resolution processes 
over new gTLDs remain deeply problematic. The draft recommendations must 
be substantially reformed in order to promote competition and innovation 
and protect freedom of expression and non-commercial uses in the new 
gTLD space. The GNSO Committee’s draft proposal would have ICANN engage 
in massive and unprecedented censorship over the use words and ideas in 
cyberspace. The draft recommendations propose that ICANN mediate between 
competing standards of religion and morality to evaluate who is ...
http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCUC_Comments_on_New_gTLDs.pdf

Danny Younger wrote:

>Re:  "But the current draft is so repugnantly
>censorious and burdensome for ICANN that most are
>opposed to it - once they actually hear what it
>proposes."
>
>Robin, I have reviewed the most current draft posted
>at
>http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/GNSO-PDP-Dec05-FR13-FEB07.htm
>
>Sorry to report that I did not locate the repugnantly
>censorious section.  Can you prehaps provide a pointer
>to the language that troubles you?
>
>Thanks,
>Danny
>
>
>
>
> 
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
>http://new.mail.yahoo.com
>  
>