NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:57:35 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
If you go straight with the triple X theme Rod will get out of the bag
the politically correct answer, I guess we have to be more clever and
ask if he supports the independent review process and how he thinks
the board has to act given that as far as I know the review process is
not binding.

My .02
Jorge

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Konstantinos has provided a better way of asking the question I was trying to ask with my second question.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> David, I would also add to any questions on the new gTLDs, whether he
>> believes that the trademark protection issue can now be considered
>> resolved after the work of the STI. Whether after the last public
>> comment period and the acceptance of the STI's work, trademark
>> protection is no longer an issue nor will it be resuscitated in the
>> future.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC-
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>>
>> You could also ask whether he thinks it's a good idea to allow powerful
>> interest groups keep trying to re-write the policies governing the new
>> gTLD introduction.
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2