On 13 Mar 2010, at 21:50, David Cake wrote:

> 	The VI resolution was a sensible middle ground IF you believe that the board is genuinely waiting for the GNSO VI policy process, and is likely to accept its recommendations.. If you believe the board is paying lip service to the GNSO policy process, and intends to ultimately reject VI, then it is not.

if the GNSO reaches a supermajority n the VI then the Board needs a supermajority to reject it.

plus i don't know what gives yuo the idea that they want to ultimately reject it.  i think it is possible that we have a rather reasonable board and the moment and should give it a chance to do the right thing.


a.