NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:24:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Even if for some valid reason confidentiality is required, 1 or more
members of the review team should be included in the distribution of
such documents with the premise to act only as observers and keep the
contents and matters absolutely confidential, that will guarantee more
transparency even if secrecy for a delicate matter is necessary.

My .02
Jorge

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following is the final version we reached in Nairobi.
>
> I have just sent a note to Cheryl asking what comes next.
>
> a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2