NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kim G. von Arx" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kim G. von Arx
Date:
Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:35:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
Dear All: 

I have to echo Konstantinos' comments and I am equally confused as to the purpose and scope of this group.  My view is that if we break up the non-commercal constituency in to its separate parts starting with not-for-profits, then we may as well create NGOs, individuals, etc.  The same goes for the other SO who could then be broken down in to their respective "interest" parts, e.g., e-tailers, financial institutions, manufacturing, etc.  I must admit I am at a loss to see the benefit of that ESPECIALLY considering that ICANN is already buried in convoluted processes and structures.  I think we should try to work on a sub-group within the NCUC to address Amber's et all concerns/interests.  Having said that, however, I certainly do not profess to understand Amber's et al concerns/interest to properly assess whether that would suffice etc.  Anyway, I just wanted to voice my confusion and concerns with respect to the break up an SO which has worked quite well within the ICANN process and I fear that the more we dilute us, the less effective we will be.   

Kim 



On 2 Nov 2010, at 12:07, Konstantinos Komaitis wrote:

> Dear Amber,
> 
> Thanks for keeping us informed and for sending this. However, I certainly feel quite confused with the statement and purpose of this new constituency. In your letter, you submit to the suggestion that up until today non-for-profit and non-governmental organisation have been unrepresented in ICANN. "We believe creating a new constituency focused the operational impact of ICANN policies on the service delivery of not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations will be an important addition to the ICANN community."
> Personally as a member of NCUC over the past five years, I would like to say that this is not accurate. A quick look at NCUC's membership roster demonstrates that there are many non-for-profit and non-governmental organisations both within and outside the US that have joined NCUC. 
> So I would like to clarify that the types of organisations you are suggesting as an important addition to the ICANN community, are already part of that community and have successfully and fairly been represented through the NCUC.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> KK
> 
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
> 
> Law Lecturer,
> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
> Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
> University of Strathclyde,
> The Law School,
> Graham Hills building, 
> 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA 
> UK
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
> http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
> Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
> Website: www.komaitis.org
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of "Kleinwachter, Wolfgang"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:31 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: AW: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
> 
> Dear Amber
> 
> In your letter your write: "As one of its major initiatives, the NPOC has placed a priority on ongoing global outreach activities, especially to communities and regions currently under-represented in ICANN. We are pleased that several organizations have already indicated an interest in the NPOC during this pendency period; however, many more are waiting for the NPOC to be officially recognized before joining."
> 
> Would it be possible to provide a list of such waiting organisations? And would it be also possible to specifiy your outreach  activities in currently under-represented regions. I am in particular interested what you have done in Eastern Europa, Central Asia and Eastern and Western Africa. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> wolfgang
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: Amber Sterling [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Gesendet: Di 02.11.2010 15:36
> An: [log in to unmask]
> Betreff: FW: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
> 
> 
> 
> The NPOC formation committee has formally submitted its charter petition to the Board (attached).
> 
> 
> 
> Amber Sterling
> 
> Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
> 
> Association of American Medical Colleges
> 
> 
> 
> From: npoc 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: 'George Sadowsky'
> Subject: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Mr. Dengate-Thrush and the ICANN Board of Directors,
> 
> 
> 
> The formation committee and organizations supporting the Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC) are pleased to submit the attached cover letter and new constituency petition.  We respectfully request your prompt consideration as we are eager to participate in the ICANN community as a recognized entity.  Please contact us at [log in to unmask] if you have any questions or require additional information.
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Amber
> 
> 
> 
> Amber Sterling
> 
> Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
> 
> Association of American Medical Colleges

ATOM RSS1 RSS2