NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:50:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Dear Adam,

just for clarification, I'm not interested in the "person", just the
"office" being represented by the person.

Just trying to understand and learn what interests lay in ICANN's
governance behind the intellectual property administration of the AAMC
and how that particular constituency is or not being represented
within the current ICANN sctructure.

Regards
Jorge

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Jorge,
>
>
> At 6:43 AM -0500 11/4/10, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>
>> Dear Amber,
>>
>> please, can you add to the list an answer explaining as a representative
>> of AAMC
>> how much experience and participation did you have in ICANN and its policy
>> development processes and what is the actual role of the Intellectual
>> property
>> administration and protection office at AAMC ?
>
>
> Why is this relevant?
>
> Constituency we're interested in, not the person, surely.
>
> Adam

ATOM RSS1 RSS2